Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-reported physical activity intensity and training volume are not related to menstrual health among recreationally active Swiss females.

BMC women's health·2026
Same author

Positive effects of brief body exercises on mood: An interventional EMA study.

Neuroscience applied·2026
Same author

Daily Life Studies on Dynamic Within-person Fluctuations of Self-efficacy in the Physical Activity Context: A Scoping Review.

Sports medicine - open·2026
Same author

Exergame Snacks: Promoting Enjoyable, Effective, and Time-Efficient Physical Activity.

Exercise and sport sciences reviews·2026
Same author

Beyond the cross-section: Rethinking the intention-behaviour gap through a conceptual and methodological lens.

British journal of health psychology·2025
Same author

Comprehensive Needs Assessment for Workplace Health Promotion: A Case Study of the University of Bern.

International journal of public health·2025
Same journal

Who bears the responsibility? Perceptions of responsibility for eating healthily and sustainably in a representative German sample.

Preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Behavioral economic demand analysis: A multidimensional framework for understanding drug reinforcement and tobacco science.

Preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Differential associations of objective hearing loss and subjective hearing difficulty with depressive symptom profiles: A nationwide population-based study in Korea' [Preventive Medicine 210 (2026) 108620].

Preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Adverse childhood experiences and household firearm ownership: A large-scale analysis of specific risk factors among 15,771 adults from four U.S. states.

Preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Worldwide prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Employment insecurity and binge drinking in the United States: Implications of unemployment insurance.

Preventive medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Methods of quantifying change in multiple risk factor interventions.

Judith J Prochaska1, Wayne F Velicer, Claudio R Nigg

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave - TRC 0984, San Francisco, CA 94143-0984, USA. JProchaska@ucsf.edu

Preventive Medicine
|March 6, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers explored five methods to measure changes in multiple health risk behaviors. Comparing these approaches is recommended to establish a consensus for effective intervention reporting.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Behavioral Science
  • Health Intervention Research

Background:

  • Multiple health risk behaviors (smoking, alcohol abuse, inactivity, poor diet) are detrimental and often co-occur.
  • Interventions targeting multiple risk factors are increasingly important for comprehensive health management.
  • Standardized methods are needed to conceptualize and measure overall behavior change.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and evaluate five distinct methods for quantifying changes in multiple risk behaviors.
  • To provide a framework for analyzing the effectiveness of multibehavioral interventions.
  • To inform the development of consensus on reporting behavior change.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from over 8000 participants in four multibehavioral interventions.
  • Description of five quantification methods: individual behavior change, combined statistical index, behavioral index, overall impact factor, and overarching outcomes.
  • Discussion of the interpretations, strengths, and limitations of each method.

Main Results:

  • Five distinct approaches to quantifying multiple risk behavior change were detailed.
  • The methods varied in their complexity, interpretability, and focus (individual behaviors vs. overall impact).
  • No single method emerged as universally superior, highlighting the need for comparative analysis.

Conclusions:

  • A lack of consensus exists on the optimal methods for examining multiple risk behavior change.
  • Researchers are encouraged to utilize and compare multiple methods in their studies.
  • Further dialogue is necessary to establish standardized approaches for conceptualizing and reporting multibehavioral intervention outcomes.