Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ileostomy revision using noncutting linear stapler.

M-L Skaerlund1, L Jacobsen, A Tøttrup

  • 1Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage Hansensgade, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
|March 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Critical assessment of staining properties of a new visualization technology: a novel, rapid and powerful immunohistochemical detection approach.

Histochemistry and cell biology·2020
Same author

EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Allergy·2017
Same author

Recombinant factor XIII prophylaxis is safe and effective in young children with congenital factor XIII-A deficiency: international phase 3b trial results.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2017
Same author

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Allergy·2017
Same author

First report on the safety and efficacy of an extended half-life glycoPEGylated recombinant FVIII for major surgery in severe haemophilia A.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2017
Same author

Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: an EAACI Position Paper.

Allergy·2017
Same journal

Rethinking lymphadenectomy in the immunotherapy era of colorectal cancer: A hypothesis-generating perspective.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same journal

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal GIST-A video vignette.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same journal

The relational core of nurse-led LARS care: Recognising an active therapeutic mechanism and building sustainable pathways.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same journal

Outcomes reported in comparative studies of surgical management of pilonidal disease: Systematic review to inform a core outcome set.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same journal

Robotic and transperineal endoscopic en bloc resection for rectal cancer with a rectovaginal fistula: Vaginal-wall fistula closure-A video vignette.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same journal

Patient-centred treatment failure and secondary prevention after Bascom I for pilonidal sinus disease.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
See all related articles

Stapled ileostomy revision for retraction is technically simple with low morbidity. However, less than half of patients achieve a satisfactory long-term result, often requiring further revision procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Stoma Care

Background:

  • Ileostomy complications like retraction and prolapse require surgical intervention.
  • Stapled revision offers a minimally invasive approach to address these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of stapled ileostomy revision for retraction and prolapse.
  • To assess the long-term outcomes and success rates of this surgical technique.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 45 patients who underwent 94 stapled ileostomy revisions between 1995 and 2005.
  • Analysis of patient records to determine indications, procedures, and outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Stomal retraction was the primary indication in 95.6% of cases.

Related Experiment Videos

  • One or more stapling procedures resulted in a normal stoma in 41.9% of patients with retraction.
  • Overall success, including other repair types, reached 69.8% for retraction.
  • Low BMI was associated with lower success rates, but no factor had statistical significance.

    • Conclusions:

    • Stapled ileostomy revision is technically straightforward and associated with low morbidity.
    • The long-term success rate for stapled revision alone is less than 50%.
    • Many patients may still benefit from alternative revision methods if stapling fails.