Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Treating patients with non-STEMI: stent the culprit artery only or address all lesions?
Mehdi H Shishehbor1, Deepak L Bhatt
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Desk F-25, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Insights
For non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), identifying the culprit lesion is challenging. We recommend stenting the culprit and other severe lesions, considering fractional flow reserve or intravascular ultrasound for unclear cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) is a frequent acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
- Current guidelines recommend invasive angiography and revascularization for the culprit lesion.
- Identifying the specific culprit lesion in non-STEMI can be difficult, unlike in STEMI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with non-STEMI.
- To address the challenges in identifying culprit lesions in non-STEMI.
- To provide recommendations for managing multivessel disease in ACS.
Main Methods:
- Review of current European and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS.
- Analysis of treatment strategies for culprit-only versus complete revascularization.
- Consideration of diagnostic tools like fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Main Results:
- Guidelines offer individualized approaches for complete versus culprit-only revascularization.
- The decision for PCI should balance success likelihood, risk, myocardial territory, and noninvasive testing.
- Stenting culprit and other severe lesions, potentially in a staged manner, is recommended after careful evaluation.
Conclusions:
- A tailored approach to revascularization in non-STEMI is crucial.
- Fractional flow reserve or intravascular ultrasound can aid in assessing nonculprit lesion severity.
- Careful consideration of individual lesion characteristics and patient risk is paramount for optimal outcomes.
Abstract:
Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) is a common presentation of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) spectrum. Currently, the recommended treatment option is an invasive approach with angiography plus coronary revascularization to treat the culprit lesion. However, unlike in STEMI--in which the culprit lesion can be easily identified--in non-STEMI identifying the culprit lesion is difficult. Therefore, some have advocated for a more definitive approach to addressing all severe lesions in patients presenting with non-STEMI. The current European guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel versus culprit-only stenting state that "the decision to perform either culprit vessel or complete revascularization can be made on an individual basis," whereas the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for multivessel PCI in patients presenting with ACS recommend that "it be performed when there is a high likelihood of success and a low risk of morbidity and the vessels to be dilated subtend a moderate or large area of viable myocardium and have high risk by noninvasive testing." Although lesions and coronary anatomies are each unique and the risk and benefit of coronary intervention to each lesion should be carefully examined, we recommend stenting the culprit lesion and other severe lesions after careful consideration, in a staged fashion if necessary. If the severity of nonculprit lesions is in question, fractional flow reserve or intravascular ultrasound should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care