Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

11:12
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Predictability of clinical assessments for driving performance
Wendy B Stav1, Michael D Justiss, Dennis P McCarthy
1Towson University, USA. wstav@towson.edu
Journal of Safety Research
|March 8, 2008
Summary
Clinical assessments for older drivers can predict driving performance. Key predictors include vision, cognitive, and motor skills, helping identify at-risk drivers more accurately.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Transportation Safety
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- The aging population is increasing, necessitating accurate methods to identify older drivers at risk.
- Current methods for assessing driving performance in older adults require refinement for better predictive accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive validity of specific clinical assessments for real-time driving performance in older drivers.
- To identify key domains and tools that can accurately identify older drivers at risk.
Main Methods:
- A battery of clinical assessments targeting vision, cognition, and motor performance was administered.
- Participants underwent an on-road driving test following the clinical assessments.
- Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of driving performance.
Main Results:
- Several assessments were found to be independently associated with driving performance.
- Significant predictors included FACTTM Contrast sensitivity slide-B, Rapid Pace Walk, Useful Field of View (UFOV) rating, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score.
- The predictive model incorporated factors from vision, cognitive, and motor domains.
Conclusions:
- A combination of clinical assessments across vision, cognitive, and motor domains can effectively predict driving performance in older adults.
- Standardizing these assessments can lead to more objective, accurate, and efficient identification of at-risk drivers.
- No single assessment tool is likely sufficient due to the complex nature of driving.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Determination of Expected Frequency
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...

