Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence of early postpartum depression and associated risk factors among selected women in southern Malawi: a nested observational study.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2023
Same author

Volatile anaesthesia and peri-operative outcomes related to cancer: a feasibility and pilot study for a large randomised control trial.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

Esmirtazapine treatment of postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms: two randomized controlled trials.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2019
Same author

Inhalational versus propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia: practice patterns and perspectives among Australasian anaesthetists.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2018
Same author

Postoperative outcomes following cardiac surgery in non-anaemic iron-replete and iron-deficient patients - an exploratory study.

Anaesthesia·2017
Same author

Simultaneous inference of a binary composite endpoint and its components.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Joint one-sided and two-sided simultaneous confidence intervals.

S Braat1, D Gerhard, L A Hothorn

  • 1Biometrics, N.V. Organon, Oss, The Netherlands Biometrics, Global Clinical Information.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|March 11, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces flexible contrast tests for analyzing complex clinical trials with mixed one- and two-sided hypotheses. These methods offer improved adaptability over standard procedures with comparable statistical power.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional clinical trial analysis often relies on two-sided hypothesis testing.
  • Complex trial designs, including multiple treatment arms and varying test directions, pose analytical challenges.
  • Existing multiple comparison procedures may lack flexibility for mixed one- and two-sided tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the application of existing multiple comparison procedures to complex clinical trial designs.
  • To introduce a flexible framework using contrast tests for analyzing trials with mixed one- and two-sided hypotheses.
  • To compare the power and flexibility of proposed contrast tests against existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Application of established multiple comparison procedures for normally distributed means (difference and ratio).
  • Development and implementation of contrast tests accommodating one- and two-sided hypothesis directions.
  • Utilizing statistical software (R and SAS System) for practical illustration.

Main Results:

  • Straightforward application of multiple comparison procedures is feasible for complex trial designs.
  • Proposed contrast tests offer a more flexible analytical framework.
  • The proposed methods achieve nearly similar statistical power compared to existing approaches.

Conclusions:

  • Mixed one- and two-sided tests provide a preferred analytical approach for certain multiarmed clinical trials.
  • Contrast tests offer enhanced flexibility for complex trial designs without compromising power.
  • The presented methods and software codes facilitate advanced statistical analysis in clinical research.