Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
Published on: May 12, 2023
What we want versus what we can get: a closer look at failure time endpoints for cardiovascular studies
Rui Song1, Thomas D Cook, Michael R Kosorok
1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7420, USA. rsong@bios.unc.edu
Insights
This review examines primary endpoints in clinical trials, suggesting a recurrent composite endpoint as a valuable alternative to traditional all-cause mortality or composite endpoints. Further clarification on composite endpoint usage is recommended for trialists.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- All-cause mortality is a common primary endpoint in clinical trials.
- Composite endpoints are frequently used but can present interpretation challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current use of all-cause mortality and composite endpoints.
- To propose a recurrent composite endpoint as a novel primary endpoint alternative.
- To provide guidance for clinical trialists and practitioners.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of primary endpoint selection in clinical trials.
- Conceptual proposal of a recurrent composite endpoint.
- Discussion of practical implications for trial design and analysis.
Main Results:
- Current practices regarding primary endpoints require clarification.
- Recurrent composite endpoints offer a potential improvement for specific trial designs.
- Guidance is offered to enhance the rigor of endpoint selection.
Conclusions:
- The selection and interpretation of primary endpoints, particularly composite endpoints, need further standardization.
- Recurrent composite endpoints represent a promising area for future research and application in clinical trials.
- Clearer guidelines are essential for optimizing the design and reporting of clinical trials.
Abstract:
In this article, we review the use of all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint as the primary endpoint and propose a recurrent composite endpoint as an alternative primary endpoint. Some general suggestions to trialists and practitioners are provided. In summary, the use of the composite endpoint is an issue that needs clarification.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
