Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prototype of the National Dose Register (NDR) for Latin America: main experiences in design and implementation.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same author

SECOND LATIN AMERICAN INTERCOMPARISON ON INTERNAL DOSE ASSESSMENT.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2015
Same author

A SOLUTION FOR NEUTRON PERSONAL DOSIMETRY IN THE ABSENCE OF WORKPLACE SPECTROMETRY.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2015
Same author

Intercomparison on measurements of the quantity personal dose equivalent Hp(10) in photon fields in the African region.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2010
Same author

Intercomparison on measurements of the quantity personal dose equivalent Hp(d) in mixed (neutron-gamma) fields--an IAEA project.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2008
Same author

Review of standards of protection for pregnant workers and their offspring.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Validation process and uncertainty budget: a recommended approach for performance verification.

R Cruz Suárez1, J Zeger

  • 1Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramerstrasse 5 P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. R.Cruz-Suarez@iaea.org

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|March 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This paper reviews methods for validating individual radiation monitoring techniques. It emphasizes that methods must be validated to ensure reliable performance for occupational radiation protection programs.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health and safety
  • Radiation physics
  • Metrology

Background:

  • The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Occupational Radiation Protection Programme aims to ensure the reliability of individual monitoring services.
  • Quality assurance in radiation monitoring requires rigorous validation of measurement methods and uncertainty assessment.
  • Intercomparison exercises are crucial for verifying the performance of monitoring service providers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and recommend methods for validating different types of measurement techniques used in individual radiation monitoring.
  • To highlight the importance of method validation as a cornerstone of quality systems in occupational radiation protection.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recommended validation methods for individual monitoring techniques.
  • Analysis of requirements for method validation in quality systems.
  • Synthesis of best practices for uncertainty budget determination.

Main Results:

  • Identified key validation requirements that methods must meet before being considered validated.
  • Highlighted the necessity of providing evidence that a method fulfills all intended use requirements.
  • Presented a review of recommended methods tailored to various measurement techniques.

Conclusions:

  • Method validation is essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of individual radiation monitoring.
  • Adherence to established validation processes provides confidence in the performance of monitoring services.
  • The reviewed methods offer guidance for implementing robust quality assurance in occupational radiation protection.