Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Combined fused in sarcoma-positive (FUS+) basophilic inclusion body disease and atypical tauopathy presenting with an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neurone disease (ALS/MND)-plus phenotype.

Neuropathology and applied neurobiology·2019

Same author

Accuracy of surgical complication rate estimation using ICD-10 codes.

The British journal of surgery·2018

Same author

Attitudes of physicians towards the care of critically ill elderly patients - a European survey.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2017

Same author

Preventing persistent organ support in ICU patients.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2017

Same author

The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU.

Intensive care medicine·2017

Same author

The difficult art of diagnostic coding.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex

Published on: July 4, 2018

Severity scoring in the ICU: a review.

K Strand¹, H Flaatten

¹Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. stkr@sus.no

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

|March 15, 2008

Summary

Intensive care unit (ICU) scoring systems help predict patient outcomes and compare quality of care. However, understanding the science behind these severity scoring systems is crucial for accurate interpretation.

Area of Science:

Critical Care Medicine
Health Services Research

Background:

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients exhibit complex, heterogeneous conditions requiring significant healthcare resources.
Organ dysfunction in critically ill patients necessitates tools for outcome prediction and quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To review frequently used scoring systems in the intensive care unit (ICU).
To categorize and discuss prognostic, single-organ failure, trauma, and organ dysfunction scoring systems.

Main Methods:

Systematic literature search of Medline and EMBASE for ICU scoring systems.
Inclusion of systems with over 50 references to identify frequently used tools.

Main Results:

The review identified three prognostic scoring systems, four single organ dysfunction (OD) scores, and three OD scores.

More Related Videos

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

Published on: December 6, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex

Published on: July 4, 2018

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

Published on: December 6, 2024

These systems are categorized into prognostic, single-organ failure, trauma, and OD classes.

Conclusions:

Scoring systems are essential for characterizing ICU populations and explaining mortality variations.
Accurate interpretation of severity scoring systems requires specialized knowledge due to potential pitfalls.