Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cold-induced vasodilation: A meta-analysis.

Temperature (Austin, Tex.)·2026
Same author

Cross-cultural translation and content validity of the Determinants of Physical Activity Questionnaire (DPAQ) in a Dutch stroke rehabilitation population and their peers without stroke.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Trunk function: the core of mobility performance in wheelchair tennis.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Factors Associated With Performance Decrements in Elite Athletes During Exercise Under Hot and Humid Ambient Conditions.

International journal of sports physiology and performance·2026
Same author

Impact of heat stress and protective clothing on healthcare workers: health, performance, and well-being in hospital settings.

Annals of work exposures and health·2025
Same author

The effect of heat acclimation on critical environmental limits and rate of rectal temperature change.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

Task specificity of finger dexterity tests.

Monique A M Berger1, Arno J Krul, Hein A M Daanen

  • 1Human Kinetic Technology, The Hague University, The Hague, The Netherlands. M.A.M.Berger@hhs.nl

Applied Ergonomics
|March 15, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The O'Connor and Purdue Pegboard tests assess finger dexterity. While gloves decreased performance for both, wetting gloves unexpectedly improved O'Connor test scores, indicating distinct test sensitivities.

More Related Videos

The Vermicelli and Capellini Handling Tests: Simple quantitative measures of dexterous forepaw function in rats and mice
09:37

The Vermicelli and Capellini Handling Tests: Simple quantitative measures of dexterous forepaw function in rats and mice

Published on: July 21, 2010

The Knob Supination Task: A Semi-automated Method for Assessing Forelimb Function in Rats
09:26

The Knob Supination Task: A Semi-automated Method for Assessing Forelimb Function in Rats

Published on: September 28, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

The Vermicelli and Capellini Handling Tests: Simple quantitative measures of dexterous forepaw function in rats and mice
09:37

The Vermicelli and Capellini Handling Tests: Simple quantitative measures of dexterous forepaw function in rats and mice

Published on: July 21, 2010

The Knob Supination Task: A Semi-automated Method for Assessing Forelimb Function in Rats
09:26

The Knob Supination Task: A Semi-automated Method for Assessing Forelimb Function in Rats

Published on: September 28, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Occupational therapy
  • Human factors engineering
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Finger dexterity tests are crucial for evaluating performance changes due to factors like gloves, cold, and pathology.
  • The O'Connor and Purdue Pegboard tests are commonly used, with an assumption of similar performance outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the O'Connor and Purdue Pegboard tests under various glove conditions (dry, wet, no gloves).
  • To determine if the tests yield comparable results when hand conditions are altered.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed both tests under dry conditions without gloves.
  • Performance was assessed with two types of Nytril gloves in both dry and wet states.

Main Results:

  • Wearing gloves reduced performance by approximately 12% on the O'Connor test and 9% on the Purdue Pegboard test.
  • Wetting the gloves did not affect Purdue Pegboard scores but significantly increased O'Connor test performance by 11%.

Conclusions:

  • The O'Connor and Purdue Pegboard tests do not produce similar results, especially under wet glove conditions.
  • Selective use of each test is recommended based on specific task requirements and environmental factors.