Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

Gender differences in interpersonal complementarity within roommate dyads.

Emily B Ansell1, John E Kurtz, Patrick M Markey

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8098, USA. emily.ansell@yale.edu

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|March 15, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
Desirable Characteristics in Others01:26

Desirable Characteristics in Others

Various factors, including the type of relationship, gender, and duration of the relationship, influence the perception of desirable characteristics in others. While certain traits such as trustworthiness, cooperativeness, agreeableness, and extraversion are universally valued across all relationships, other characteristics are context-dependent and gain prominence based on specific relational dynamics.Universal and Context-Dependent TraitsTrustworthiness and cooperativeness are fundamental...
Relationship Growth01:27

Relationship Growth

Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity01:28

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Momentary Peer Acceptance: An fMRI-EMA Integration Study of Peer Acceptance and Emotions.

Child psychiatry and human development·2026
Same author

Defensive or Deceptive? Two Strategies for Detecting Concealed Psychopathology With the Personality Assessment Inventory.

Assessment·2026
Same author

Cannabis modalities matter for momentary subjective drug effects.

Addictive behaviors·2026
Same author

The association between cannabis and alcohol co-use and momentary subjective effects: Risks for increasingly hazardous cannabis use.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2025
Same author

Deception Detection: Using Machine Learning to Analyze 911 Calls.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024
Same author

Sex differences in the prospective association of excessively long reaction times and hazardous cannabis use at six months.

Addictive behaviors reports·2024

Complementarity theory suggests relationship success depends on interpersonal style. This study found women reported more complementarity, and greater dominance complementarity correlated with higher relationship cohesion for both genders.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Relationship Science

Background:

  • Complementarity theory posits that differing interpersonal styles foster relationship success.
  • Previous research has explored gender differences in relationship dynamics.
  • The study addresses a gap by examining same-sex dyads and utilizing informant reports.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate gender differences in interpersonal complementarity within same-sex peer dyads.
  • To examine the relationship between complementarity and relationship cohesion.
  • To extend understanding of complementarity theory in the context of roommate relationships.

Main Methods:

  • 120 participants (30 male and 30 female roommate dyads) were recruited.
  • Participants completed interpersonal circumplex ratings of their roommates.

More Related Videos

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

  • A relationship cohesion measure was administered to assess dyadic bonds.

    • Main Results:

    • Women reported significantly higher levels of complementarity compared to men in their roommate dyads.
    • For both men and women, increased complementarity in dominance was associated with greater relationship cohesion.
    • The findings suggest a nuanced role of complementarity in relationship quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Gender differences in complementarity exist, with women reporting more than men.
    • Dominance complementarity is a key factor in relationship cohesion for both genders.
    • Results offer insights into gendered social development and interpersonal relationship dynamics.