Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Probability stratification and systematic diagnostic approach for chest pain patients in the emergency department
Roberto Bassan1, Lucia Pimenta, Marcelo Scofano
1Pro-Cardiaco Hospital / PROCEP, Rio de Janeiro, 22.280-020. procep@procardiaco.com.br
Insights
Chest pain type is the best initial diagnostic tool for ruling in or out acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department. Further cardiac biomarker testing is recommended for suspicious cases.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Strategies
Background:
- Managing emergency department chest pain patients presents challenges in differentiating those requiring hospitalization from those who can be discharged.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of a probability stratification model and a systematic diagnostic strategy for chest pain patients.
- To determine the most effective diagnostic tool for ruling in/out acute coronary syndromes on emergency department admission.
Main Methods:
- Prospective evaluation of 1003 consecutive chest pain patients stratified for ACS risk.
- Utilized chest pain characteristics, admission electrocardiogram (ECG), and serial creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) measurements.
- Compared diagnostic performance of chest pain type, ECG, and CK-MB.
Main Results:
- Chest pain type demonstrated higher sensitivity (94%) and negative predictive value (97%) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to ECG and CK-MB.
- Serial CK-MB measurements ruled out AMI by 3-9 hours postadmission depending on patient risk stratification.
- Chest pain type was the strongest independent predictor of ACS in patients without ST-segment elevation.
Conclusions:
- Chest pain characteristics are the most valuable single diagnostic tool for initial ACS assessment in the emergency department.
- Patients with suspicious chest pain require extended monitoring with serial CK-MB measurements up to 9 hours to rule out AMI.
Abstract:
Management of chest pain patients in the emergency department has been a dilemma because of difficulty in identifying those who can be immediately discharged and those who need to be hospitalized. We assessed the efficacy of a probability stratification model and a systematic diagnostic strategy in 1003 consecutive chest pain patients prospectively evaluated and stratified for acute coronary syndromes according to chest pain characteristics and admission electrocardiogram. Patients with no suspicion of acute coronary syndromes (n = 224) were immediately discharged, whereas those with very-high probability (n =119) were admitted to the coronary care unit. Remaining patients were evaluated in a Chest Pain Unit and investigated during a 9-hour period (intermediate-probability, n = 433) (route 2) and a 6-hour period (low-probability, n = 277) (route 3). Sensitivity and negative predictive value of chest pain type for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (94% and 97%, respectively) was much better than the admission electrocardiogram (49% and 86%, respectively) and admission creatine kinase-MB (46% and 86%, respectively). Serial creatine kinase-MB determinations ruled out acute myocardial infarction by the third-hour postadmission in all route 3 patients but only at the ninth-hour in route 2 patients. For patients with no ST-segment elevation, chest pain type was the strongest independent predictor of acute coronary syndromes. It is concluded that chest pain type is the best single diagnostic tool to rule in/out acute coronary syndromes on admission to the emergency department. Patients with suspicious chest pain must have serum creatine kinase-MB measurements up to 9 hours postadmission to rule out acute myocardial infarction.
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina II: Classification
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
