Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

David A Nelson1, Gail S Donaldson, Heather Kreft

  • 1Clinical Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, MMC396, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. dan@umn.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 19, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implant users showed different spatial tuning based on stimulation type. Bipolar stimulation resulted in sharper tuning than monopolar, but this spatial tuning similarity to acoustic hearing suggests it may not limit speech perception.

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Step-By-Step: The BRIDGE Framework for Equitable Outreach to People Experiencing Homelessness.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same author

The impact of social determinants on care for veterans with cancer: a qualitative study.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026
Same author

Relationship between skin temperature and blood flow during exposure to radio frequency energy: implications for device development.

BMC biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Millimeter wave radiation to measure blood flow in healthy human subjects.

Physiological measurement·2024
Same author

Anesthesiologists and Community Engagement: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2023
Same author

Parenting measurement, normativeness, and associations with child outcomes: Comparing evidence from four non-Western cultures.

Developmental science·2023

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) aim to restore hearing by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve.
  • Understanding the spatial selectivity of electrical stimulation is crucial for optimizing CI performance and speech perception.
  • Psychophysical spatial tuning curves (STCs) provide insights into the tonotopic organization and selectivity within the auditory system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves (fmSTCs) between bipolar and monopolar stimulation modes in cochlear implant users.
  • To investigate how stimulation mode affects spatial tuning characteristics, such as slope and bandwidth.
  • To compare electric hearing spatial tuning with acoustic hearing tuning to assess its impact on speech perception.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured fmSTCs in 12 CI users (6 bipolar, 6 monopolar) using a fixed-level probe and variable-level maskers.
  • Analyzed fmSTC slopes and spatial bandwidths across different probe levels.
  • Converted fmSTCs to acoustic frequency representations using Greenwood's equation for comparison with acoustic listener data.

Main Results:

  • Bipolar stimulation yielded significantly steeper fmSTC slopes (3.7 dB/mm) compared to monopolar stimulation (1.2 dB/mm).
  • Spatial bandwidths were narrower with bipolar stimulation (2.6 mm) than with monopolar stimulation (4.6 mm).
  • Electric spatial tuning characteristics, when mapped to acoustic frequencies, resembled the broad tuning observed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners at high levels.

Conclusions:

  • Cochlear implant stimulation mode significantly influences psychophysical spatial tuning, with bipolar offering sharper tuning than monopolar.
  • The observed spatial tuning in electric hearing is comparable to acoustic hearing, suggesting it is not the primary limitation for speech perception.
  • Further research should explore other factors, such as neural processing or spectral resolution, that may limit speech understanding in CI users.