Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Binaural audio frontend processing for cochlear implants inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

No association between idiopathic hidden hearing loss and behavioral adaptation to noise in humans.

Hearing research·2025
Same author

Speech Recognition and Noise Adaptation in Realistic Noises.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same author

Comparison of Performance for Cochlear-Implant Listeners Using Audio Processing Strategies Based on Short-Time Fast Fourier Transform or Spectral Feature Extraction.

Ear and hearing·2024
Same author

Impaired noise adaptation contributes to speech intelligibility problems in people with hearing loss.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral noise precursors on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans.

Hearing research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression.

Enrique A Lopez-Poveda1, Ana Alves-Pinto

  • 1Unidad de Audición Computacional y Psicoacústica, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain. ealopezpoveda@usal.es

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 19, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory compression in the cochlea is similar across different sites. This study confirms previous findings on auditory compression using a novel method, supporting standard techniques for normal-hearing listeners.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Previous research suggested similar peripheral auditory compression at apical and basal cochlear sites.
  • Existing conclusions relied on temporal masking curves (TMCs) with a specific assumption about forward masking decay.
  • Compression's frequency range was thought to be wider in apical than basal cochlear regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To verify previous conclusions on cochlear auditory compression using a different analytical assumption.
  • To investigate the validity of standard TMC methods for inferring auditory compression.

Main Methods:

  • Measured temporal masking curves (TMCs) in normal-hearing listeners.
  • Utilized probe frequencies (f(P)) of 500 Hz and 4000 Hz.
  • Employed masker frequencies (f(M)) at 0.4, 0.55, and 1.0 times the probe frequency.
  • Tested probe sensation levels of 9 dB and 15 dB.
  • Assessed cochlear response linearity by analyzing TMC vertical shifts with a 6 dB probe level increase.

Main Results:

  • The results were consistent with conclusions from earlier studies on auditory compression.
  • Observed TMC shifts indicated compressive cochlear responses.
  • Findings support the notion that auditory compression is similar across cochlear sites.

Conclusions:

  • The study validates previous findings regarding the degree and extent of cochlear auditory compression.
  • The results support the underlying assumptions of the standard temporal masking curve (TMC) method.
  • The findings are applicable to understanding auditory processing in normal-hearing individuals.