Related Experiment Videos
A comparative study between visible-light-activated and autopolymerizing sealants in relation to retention
M Gandini1, V Vertuan, J M Davis
1Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, São Paulo, Brasil.
ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children
|July 1, 1991
Summary
This study compared three dental sealants in children. Sealite showed varied retention compared to Concise and Delton, with no significant differences between maxillary and mandibular teeth for any sealant type.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
Background:
- Dental sealants are crucial for preventing pit and fissure caries in children.
- Understanding the retention rates of different sealant types is essential for effective caries prevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the retention capacity of two visible-light-activated dental sealants (Concise-3M, Sealite-Kerr) against a commonly used autopolymerizing sealant (Delton-Johnson & Johnson).
Main Methods:
- Sixty-two children (6-11 years) received 229 first permanent molar sealant applications.
- Sealants were applied following manufacturer instructions with partial isolation.
- Evaluations for complete, partial, or failed retention occurred at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in retention was found between Concise and Delton sealants in maxillary versus mandibular teeth.
- Significant differences in retention were observed between Concise and Sealite (maxillary and mandibular) and between Sealite and Delton (maxillary).
- Retention rates did not significantly differ between maxillary and mandibular teeth for the same sealant type.
Conclusions:
- Sealant retention can vary significantly between different types, impacting clinical effectiveness.
- Clinicians should consider sealant type and arch location when making treatment decisions for caries prevention.
- Further research may elucidate factors influencing differential sealant retention.