Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning modes, feature correlations, and memory-based categorization.

W D Wattenmaker1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Incidental learning allows access to complex correlations, even with rich stimuli. Intentional encoding struggles with complex data, highlighting the benefits of storing examples for future needs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Domains and knowledge effects: strategies in object and social classification.

The American journal of psychology·2000
Same author

The influence of prior knowledge in intentional versus incidental concept learning.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

Analogical versus rule-based classification.

Memory & cognition·1995
Same author

Knowledge structures and linear separability: integrating information in object and social categorization.

Cognitive psychology·1995
Same author

Incidental concept learning, feature frequency, and correlated properties.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·1993
Same author

Relational properties and memory-based category construction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·1992

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Studies
  • Information Processing

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals encode and retrieve information from complex stimuli is crucial.
  • Prior research suggests encoding conditions significantly impact memory retrieval and correlation detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of intentional versus incidental encoding on the ability to detect correlations within rich, exemplar-specific information.
  • To examine how stimulus complexity and required inferences affect correlation access.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were exposed to descriptions rich in exemplar-specific information containing embedded correlations.
  • Correlations were examined under both intentional (focused on learning) and incidental (unaware of correlation task) encoding conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The number of dimensions involved in correlations and the complexity of inferences required were varied.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants in incidental encoding conditions successfully accessed embedded correlations, even with 3 dimensions and complex inferential requirements.
    • In contrast, participants in intentional encoding conditions showed limited access to correlations.
    • The richness of stimuli hindered correlation detection during intentional encoding, leading to impoverished representations.

    Conclusions:

    • Incidental learning facilitates the detection of complex correlations within rich data, outperforming intentional encoding.
    • Storing detailed examples offers advantages for addressing diverse and unforeseen information retrieval needs.
    • Cognitive representations formed during rich stimulus encoding may be too simplified for complex correlation recovery.