Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

04:01
Point of Care Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasound of the Middle Cerebral Artery
Published on: August 9, 2024
Diagnosing cerebral collateral flow patterns: accuracy of non-invasive testing.
Jeroen Hendrikse1, Catharina J M Klijn, Alexander C van Huffelen
1Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.hendrikse@azu.nl
Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 20, 2008
Summary
Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) show moderate to good diagnostic value for assessing intracranial collateral flow in patients with carotid occlusion, compared to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (iaDSA).
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Vascular Imaging
Background:
- Non-invasive methods for assessing internal carotid artery disease are increasingly important.
- Evaluating collateral flow is crucial for understanding stroke risk and management.
- Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (iaDSA) is a gold standard but invasive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with iaDSA.
- To assess the ability of TCD and MRA to detect collateral flow via major intracerebral collateral branches.
- To determine the value of these non-invasive techniques in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 97 consecutive patients with recent cerebral ischemia and carotid artery occlusion.
- Comparison of TCD (temporal bone window) and MRA (phase contrast and time of flight) with iaDSA.
- Evaluation of collateral flow through the anterior and posterior circle of Willis.
Main Results:
- iaDSA visualized collateral flow in the anterior circle of Willis in 97 patients and posterior communicating artery in 67.
- MRA and TCD demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy (80%) for anterior circle of Willis collateral flow.
- For the posterior communicating artery, MRA sensitivity was 33% and TCD was 76%, with varying specificities and accuracies.
Conclusions:
- Combined MRA and TCD offer moderate to good diagnostic value for intracranial collateral flow assessment.
- These non-invasive methods are valuable in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion.
- Further refinement may improve accuracy, especially for posterior communicating artery evaluation.
