Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties
Published on: June 7, 2020
Centralized versus decentralized decision-making for recycled material flows
I-Hsuan Hong1, Jane C Ammons, Matthew J Realff
1Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta Hsueh Road, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan. ihong@mail.nctu.edu.tw
Centralized planning in reverse logistics networks increases total net profit compared to decentralized models. Careful design of decentralized contracts is crucial to maintain system efficiency and scope.
Area of Science:
- Operations Research
- Supply Chain Management
- Environmental Sustainability
Background:
- Reverse logistics systems are essential for managing end-of-life products through collection, consolidation, refurbishment, and demanufacturing.
- Decision-making models for material flows and pricing in reverse logistics networks significantly impact system profitability and efficiency.
- Existing research often focuses on specific aspects, necessitating a comparative analysis of centralized versus decentralized approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of centralized and decentralized decision-making models in reverse logistics networks.
- To analyze the impact of different planning structures on material flows, transaction prices, and overall net profit.
- To provide insights into optimizing contract mechanisms for decentralized reverse logistics systems.
Main Methods:
- Development and comparison of centralized and decentralized models for reverse logistics planning.
- Numerical simulation to evaluate material flows, transaction prices, and net profit under both models.
- Analysis of decision-making authority and coordination mechanisms in each approach.
Main Results:
- The centralized model demonstrates a higher total net profit compared to the decentralized model.
- Decentralized systems may lead to overestimation of material flows and profit when a centralized perspective is used for prediction.
- The study highlights potential inefficiencies and scope limitations in decentralized systems without careful contract design.
Conclusions:
- Centralized planning offers superior financial performance in reverse logistics networks.
- Effective contract design is critical for mitigating efficiency losses in decentralized reverse logistics operations.
- The findings underscore the importance of aligning decision-making structures with system objectives for optimal reverse logistics management.
Related Concept Videos
Recycling Endosomes and Transcytosis
The recycling endosome is not a single organelle but an extensively tubulated network of recycling pathways. It functions in storing molecules or transporting them across...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Bioplastics
Microbial Bioremediation of Plastics

