Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Commentary: freedom and function.

Alec Buchanan1

  • 1Division of Law and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. alec.buchanan@yale.edu

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|March 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration of Youths as Adults.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2024
Same author

Mute by Visitation of God, Competency to Stand Trial and Fitness to Plead.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2024
Same author

Victimization in schizophrenia and its relation to violence.

Schizophrenia research·2023
Same author

Psychosocial function, legal involvement and violence in mental disorder - CORRIGENDUM.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2023
Same author

Psychosocial function, legal involvement and violence in mental disorder - CORRIGENDUM.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2022
Same author

Psychosocial function, legal involvement and violence in mental disorder.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2021
Same journal

National Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Exposure to Correctional Psychiatry.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Pregnancy Criminalization in the United States.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Letter.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Managing Violence in State Hospitals with Forensic Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Plea Bargaining Participation and Competency Evaluation Considerations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
See all related articles

Forensic psychiatrists can provide court testimony without resolving the free will debate. Legal systems focus on functional impairment, not philosophical determinism, for assessing responsibility.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Legal Psychology
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • The debate on determinism versus free will is a longstanding philosophical inquiry.
  • Forensic psychiatry operates within legal frameworks that do not require a definitive answer to the free will question.
  • Legal excusing conditions, such as the insanity defense, are based on functional impairment, not the metaphysical status of free will.

Discussion:

  • Forensic psychiatrists can offer valuable testimony regarding functional impairments relevant to legal responsibility.
  • Legal systems, like that proposed by Herbert Hart, maintain a presumption of responsibility based on the ability to make choices, pending definitive proof of determinism.
  • This perspective aligns with the view that mental responsibility is linked to a natural ability to have chosen otherwise.

Related Experiment Videos

Key Insights:

  • The absence of free will is not an established legal excusing condition.
  • Psychiatric testimony is crucial for evaluating functional impairments in legal defenses like insanity.
  • Legal responsibility is pragmatically assigned based on the capacity for choice, even amidst deterministic arguments.

Outlook:

  • Continued focus on functional capacity in forensic evaluations.
  • Potential for legal systems to adapt to evolving philosophical and scientific understandings of determinism.
  • The practical application of psychiatric expertise in legal contexts remains essential regardless of the free will debate's resolution.