Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Egoism and Altruism

Egoism and Altruism

Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

Motivational Bias

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

National survey of real-world treatment patterns for early- and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma reveals wide variation across Australian states.

Internal medicine journal·2026

Same author

Becoming Speciesist: How Children and Adults Differ in Valuing Animals by Species and Cognitive Capacity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025

Same author

Will Human-Animal Chimeras Cause Moral Confusion? Exploring Public Attitudes.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2025

Same author

Case Report: Partial Splenic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Painful Splenomegaly Secondary to Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension.

Case reports in hepatology·2025

Same author

National Survey of Real-World Australian Treatment Patterns for Patients With Very-Early-To Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Cancer medicine·2025

Same author

Medical assistance in dying for mental illness: a complex intervention requiring a correspondingly complex evaluation approach: commentary, Malhi et al.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?

Guy Kahane¹, Nicholas Shackel

¹Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK.

|March 21, 2008

Summary

Ventromedial-prefrontal-cortex (VMPC) damage may not cause utilitarian moral judgments. Methodological issues with moral scenarios challenge previous findings on VMPC patients and utilitarian bias.

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Moral Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

Neuroscience research increasingly explores utilitarian and non-utilitarian moral judgments.
Previous studies suggested patients with ventromedial-prefrontal-cortex (VMPC) damage exhibit utilitarian moral reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the methodology used in studies examining moral judgment in VMPC patients.
To reassess claims of a utilitarian bias in individuals with VMPC damage.

Main Methods:

Analysis of moral judgment scenarios used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies.
Comparison of responses from normal subjects and subjects with VMPC damage.

Main Results:

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Many moral scenarios employed do not present a clear conflict between utilitarian outcomes and duty.

This methodological limitation raises concerns about the validity of previous conclusions.

Conclusions:

The claim that VMPC patients have an "utilitarian bias" is premature due to flaws in the experimental design.
Further research with refined moral scenarios is needed to accurately assess the role of VMPC in moral decision-making.