Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Electrochemical Detection of Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effect on Extracellular Electron Transport in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1
Published on: April 16, 2018
Redox potential difference between Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Clostridium beijerinckii flavodoxins
1Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. hzi1@usc.edu
Abstract:
The redox potential of the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) hydroquinones for one-electron reduction in the Desulfovibrio vulgaris ( D. vulgaris) flavodoxin ( E sq/hq for FMNH (*)/FMNH (-)) was calculated using the crystal structure of the relevant hydroquinone form and compared to the results of the Clostridium beijerinckii ( C. beijerinckii) flavodoxin. In D. vulgaris and C. beijerinckii flavodoxins, the protein side chain causes significant downshifts of 170 and 240 mV in E sq/hq, respectively. In the C. beijerinckii flavodoxin, the E sq/hq downshift because of the protein side chain is essentially compensated by the counter influence of the protein backbone ( E sq/hq upshift of 260 mV). However, in the D. vulgaris flavodoxin, the corresponding protein backbone influence on E sq/hq is significantly small, i.e., less than half of that in the C. beijerinckii flavodoxin. In particular, there is a significant difference in the influence of the protein backbone of the so-called 60s loop region between the two flavodoxins. The E sq/hq difference can be best explained by the lower compensation of the side chain influence by the backbone influence in the D. vulgaris flavodoxin than in the C. beijerinckii flavodoxin.
Related Concept Videos
Redox Equilibria: Overview
Anoxygenic Photosynthesis
Ladder Diagrams: Redox Equilibria
Consider the Fe3+/Fe2+ half-reaction, which has a standard-state potential of +0.771 V. At potentials more positive than +0.771 V, Fe3+ predominates, whereas Fe2+...
Redox Reactions
Redox Reactions
Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacteria

