Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
Published on: February 9, 2022
Intra-session repeatability of FET and FEV6 in the general population
Annette Kainu1, Ari Lindqvist, Seppo Sarna
1Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. annette.kainu@fimnet.fi
Background:
The recent American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society spirometry guidelines harmonized quality criteria and included assessment of forced expiratory time (FET) in bronchodilation testing when an isolated significant forced vital capacity (FVC) bronchodilation effect is observed. No consensus exists on the criteria of accepted variability of FET. Forced expiratory volume in 6 s (FEV6) has been suggested to replace FVC, especially in primary care. We examined the variability of FET and FEV6 and its determinants in the general population.
Methods:
We studied the results of acceptable flow-volume measurements from a general population sample of 603 subjects aged 25-74 years. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CoV), absolute and relative differences of FET, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV6 and FVC from the three acceptable curves were calculated.
Results:
FET had a mean CoV of 11.3% and ICC of 0.873. The average CoV and ICC for FEV1, FVC and FEV6 were 1.4% and 0.996, respectively. The 95th percentile of FET difference was 2.7 s. Older age was associated with slightly higher variability. Reproducibility of FET (CoV 10.6%) was better, that of both FEV6 (1.5%) and FVC (1.7%) slightly worse, in subjects with airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC < 88% predicted).
Conclusions:
Intra-session variability of FET was eightfold compared with other flow-volume variables. Variability of FEV1, FEV6 and FVC were similar. The findings suggest that the upper limit of intra-session repeatability of FET is around 3.0 s. In subjects with airflow limitation FEV6 was slightly but not significantly less variable than FVC.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

