Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Thromboembolic complications after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation incidence, predictors, and clinical
Antonio Russo1, Francesco Grigioni, Jean-François Avierinos
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Objectives:
We sought to define thromboembolic risk after surgery for mitral regurgitation (MR), particularly ischemic stroke (IS) compared with the general population.
Background:
Guidelines recommend surgery in asymptomatic patients with MR, but IS risks are unknown.
Methods:
In 1,344 patients (age 65 +/- 12 years) consecutively operated for MR (procedures: 897 mitral valve repair [MRep] and 447 valve replacement: 231 mechanical mitral valve replacement [MVRm], 216 biological mitral valve replacement [MVRb]), thromboembolic complications, particularly IS (diagnosed by neurologists), during follow-up were assessed early (<30 days), midterm (30 to 180 days), and long-term (>or=180 days).
Results:
Ischemic stroke occurred in 130 patients: 1.9 +/- 0.4% and 2.7 +/- 0.5% at 30 days and 180 days, respectively, and 8.1 +/- 0.8% at 5 years. We found that IS rates were lowest after MRep versus MVRb and MVRm (6.1 +/- 0.9% vs. 8 +/- 2.1%, and 16.1 +/- 2.7% at 5 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Comparison with population-expected IS showed high risk at <30 days (risk ratio 41, 95% confidence interval 26 to 60, p < 0.001 but p > 0.10 between procedures) and moderate risk at >30 days (risk ratio 1.7 overall; 1.3 for MRep; 0.98 for MVRb; 4.8 for MVRm). Beyond 180 days, IS risk declined further and was similar to the population for MRep (relative risk 1.2) and for MVRb (relative risk 0.9). Bleeding risk >30 days was lowest in MRep versus MVRb and MVRm (10-year risk 7 +/- 1%, 14 +/- 4%, and 16 +/- 3%, respectively).
Conclusions:
Thromboembolic complications after MR surgery are a reason for both concern and encouragement. The risk of IS is notable early, irrespective of procedure, but in the long term it is not greater than in the population after MRep and MVRb. Preference for MRep should be emphasized, and trials aiming at preventing IS should be conducted to reduce thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk after surgery for MR.
Insights
Thromboembolic risk, particularly ischemic stroke (IS), after mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery is high early but decreases long-term. Mitral valve repair (MRep) offers the lowest long-term IS and bleeding risks compared to valve replacements.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Thromboembolic Disease
Background:
- Guidelines recommend mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery for asymptomatic patients.
- Thromboembolic risks, specifically ischemic stroke (IS), post-MR surgery are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the thromboembolic risk, focusing on IS, following MR surgery.
- To compare IS risk after different surgical procedures (mitral valve repair [MRep] vs. mechanical [MVRm] and biological [MVRb] mitral valve replacement) with the general population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 1,344 patients undergoing MR surgery (MRep, MVRm, MVRb) was analyzed.
- Thromboembolic complications, particularly IS diagnosed by neurologists, were assessed at early (<30 days), midterm (30-180 days), and long-term (>180 days) follow-up intervals.
- IS risk was compared to population-expected rates.
Main Results:
- Ischemic stroke occurred in 130 patients, with cumulative rates at 5 years of 6.1% (MRep), 8% (MVRb), and 16.1% (MVRm).
- Early IS risk (<30 days) was significantly elevated across all procedures compared to the general population (Risk Ratio 41).
- Long-term IS risk (>180 days) was similar to the general population for MRep (Relative Risk 1.2) and MVRb (0.98), but remained high for MVRm (4.8).
- Bleeding risk at 10 years was lowest following MRep (7%) compared to MVRb (14%) and MVRm (16%).
Conclusions:
- Thromboembolic complications post-MR surgery warrant attention, especially in the early period.
- Long-term IS risk is comparable to the general population after MRep and MVRb, but not MVRm.
- Mitral valve repair (MRep) is associated with lower long-term thromboembolic and bleeding risks, supporting its preference.
- Further trials are needed to mitigate thromboembolic and bleeding risks after MR surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
