Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
Published on: February 23, 2017
Accuracy of the size estimation in wireless capsule endoscopy: calibrating the M2A PillCam (with video)
Florian Graepler1, Manuel Wolter, Reinhard Vonthein
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinic Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Objective:
To describe the accuracy and precision of a size estimation in wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) and to develop a simple device that facilitates learning of an exact size estimation in WCE.
Design:
A prospective study with an animal model. Seventy-five medical students were compared with 21 physicians not performing WCEs and 21 experts actively performing WCEs.
Interventions:
Video sequences were recorded with a PillCam wireless endoscope in a porcine small-bowel model after implantation of "lesions" of defined sizes. Volunteers estimated the diameter of these "lesions" with and without the use of a calibrator device, which was a picture from a black-and-white grid taken with the PillCam in direct contact with the transparent dome.
Results:
The students overestimated the diameters of the lesions by 26%. The physicians and experts underestimated the diameters by 32% and 31%, respectively. With the help of the calibrator device, the students underestimated the diameters by 15%. Physicians underestimated the diameters by 21%, whereas experts still underestimated the diameters by 35%. The interindividual log-scale standard deviation (SD) of the estimated diameters from the true diameter decreased during training in all groups, whereas intraindividual SDs decreased in students and increased in experts.
Limitation:
An animal model.
Conclusions:
All investigators agree better when a calibrating device was offered. Experts who performed more than 400 WCEs tended to be more precise.
