Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determinants of cue interactions.

Daniel S Wheeler1, Ralph R Miller

  • 1Johns Hopkins University, USA.

Behavioural Processes
|March 22, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pavlovian conditioning involves training variables like contiguity and contingency. Recent experiments reveal that typically detrimental manipulations can paradoxically enhance conditioned stimulus (CS) responding when combined, a phenomenon explained by counteraction effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the generality of behavioral theory and abstract phenomena.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2026
Same author

Comparisons of extinction, counterconditioning, and novelty-facilitated extinction within ABA vs. ABC renewal designs.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

Aversion-induced dopamine reductions predict drug-taking and escape behaviors.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Rethinking memory impairments: Retrieval failure.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024
Same author

Aversion-induced drug taking and escape behavior involve similar nucleus accumbens core dopamine signaling signatures.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Behavioral and physiological changes during the estrous cycle of socially housed female guinea pigs.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Flexible time-series analysis: A dynamically aware method for inferring directed dependencies in behavioral data.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Effects of group size and landmarks on escape behavior of three fish species.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Vocal individuality in two sympatric seabird species: The role of developmental strategy, analytical approach and sample size.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

No evidence of sex-specific responses to chemosensory risk assessment cues in Harts rivulus.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Exploratory responses of rats to cage-mates and conspecifics from another cage in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm with multiple habituation stimuli.

Behavioural processes·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral science
  • Learning and memory
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Pavlovian conditioning is influenced by training variables such as contiguity, contingency, and the presence of multiple conditioned stimuli (CSs).
  • Certain experimental manipulations typically reduce responding to a CS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent experiments on counteraction effects in Pavlovian conditioning.
  • To provide a theoretical framework explaining how combined manipulations can alter CS responding.
  • To discuss the boundary conditions and limitations of the proposed theory.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent experimental studies in Pavlovian conditioning.
  • Analysis of manipulations affecting conditioned stimulus (CS) responding.
  • Development of a theoretical framework for counteraction effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Some manipulations that normally decrease CS responding can increase it when combined with other detrimental manipulations.
  • These counteraction effects represent a significant deviation from expected outcomes in conditioning.
  • The review identifies conditions under which these effects occur and their theoretical implications.

Conclusions:

  • Counteraction effects challenge traditional views of Pavlovian conditioning variables.
  • A novel theoretical framework is proposed to explain these paradoxical findings.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the scope and limitations of counteraction effects in learning.