Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
08:52
Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
Published on: March 18, 2022
Mirels' rating for humerus lesions is both reproducible and valid
Andrew R Evans1, John Bottros, William Grant
1SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|March 22, 2008
Summary
The Mirels rating system for predicting fractures in humeral bone lesions is reproducible but lacks specificity. Further validation is needed to improve its accuracy in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic oncology
- Diagnostic accuracy studies
Background:
- Mirels' rating system is a standard tool for assessing fracture risk in long bone metastases.
- Independent validation of Mirels' system for humeral lesions is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of Mirels' rating system for predicting impending pathologic fractures in the humerus.
- To assess the system's diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) for humeral lesions.
Main Methods:
- A web-based survey was conducted with 39 physicians assessing 17 case histories and radiographs of humeral metastases.
- Physicians used Mirels' criteria to predict fractures; predictions were compared to actual outcomes in 12 patients.
- Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa analysis for reproducibility.
Main Results:
- Using Mirels' original definition (≥9 points), sensitivity was 14.5% and specificity was 82.9%.
- Lowering the threshold to ≥7 points improved sensitivity to 81% but decreased specificity to 32%.
- Kappa analysis indicated moderate reproducibility for fracture prediction.
Conclusions:
- The Mirels rating system demonstrates reproducibility and validity for humeral lesions.
- Low specificity at acceptable sensitivity levels remains a significant limitation, similar to findings in femoral lesions.
