Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
The Influence of Affect on Cognition01:29

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exceptional Response to Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma With Ultramutated Phenotype Associated With a DNA Polymerase-ε Mutation.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Pan-cancer N-glycoproteomic atlas of patient-derived xenografts uncovers FAT2 as an actionable surface target.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Small molecule inhibition rescues the skeletal dysplasia phenotype of Trpv4 mutant mice.

JCI insight·2026
Same author

Dose-dependent neurotoxic chemotherapy and corneal nerve morphological changes.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same author

<u>B</u>uccal fat applied to trans<u>o</u>ral robotic <u>l</u>ateral oropharyngectomy defects to lessen radical <u>t</u>onsillectomy pain (BOLT): a single-centre, phase II, parallel, randomised control trial study protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Effects of current smoking on treatment outcomes in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using the international PURPLE pancreas cancer registry.

Journal of gastrointestinal oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Age differences in choice satisfaction: a positivity effect in decision making.

Sunghan Kim1, M Karl Healey, David Goldstein

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. shkim@psych.utoronto.ca

Psychology and Aging
|March 26, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Older adults exhibit a positivity effect in decision-making when explicitly evaluating choices, leading to greater satisfaction. This effect persists over time, highlighting age-related differences in decision strategies.

More Related Videos

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Aging Research
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • The positivity effect suggests older adults focus more on positive information.
  • Previous research indicates potential age-related differences in decision-making processes.
  • The impact of explicit evaluation on choice satisfaction in older adults remains an area for exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the positivity effect in decision-making among older adults.
  • To examine how explicit evaluation of options influences age differences in choice satisfaction.
  • To determine if age differences in satisfaction are moderated by the evaluation condition.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving younger and older adults choosing between products.
  • Participants were assigned to either an explicit evaluation condition or a no-evaluation condition.
  • Satisfaction with choices was measured immediately after the decision and again after two weeks.

Main Results:

  • Older adults in the evaluation condition reported higher satisfaction with their choices compared to younger adults.
  • Older adults in the evaluation condition listed more positive and fewer negative attributes.
  • No significant age differences in satisfaction were found in the no-evaluation condition.
  • The enhanced satisfaction in older adults persisted two weeks post-experiment.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit evaluation of options enhances decision satisfaction in older adults, likely due to a positivity effect.
  • The positivity effect in decision-making is contingent on the evaluation process.
  • Age does not affect the ability to predict changes in satisfaction over time.