Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Central venous catheters in hemodialysis: to accept recommendations or to stick to own experience
Radojica Stolić1, Goran Trajković, Vladan Perić
1School of Medicine, Pristina/Kosovska Mitrovica, Kragujevac, Serbia. radsto@ptt.yu
Insights
Central vein catheters for hemodialysis, particularly those inserted into the femoral vein, show a low complication rate. Femoral vein catheterization is a safe option, with no increased risk of infection or thrombosis.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Access
- Nephrology
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Central vein catheters are crucial for hemodialysis, but complications like infection and thrombosis are common.
- Catheter insertion sites include the jugular, subclavian, and femoral veins.
- Understanding complication rates across different insertion sites is vital for patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the prevalence of complications associated with central vein catheters for hemodialysis based on insertion site.
- To compare infection and thrombosis rates between jugular, subclavian, and femoral vein catheterizations.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 464 central vein catheters inserted between December 2003 and November 2006.
- Data collected on catheter placement, duration of use, and associated complications.
- Microbiological analysis of skin cultures, catheter tips, and blood cultures when infection or bacteremia was suspected.
Main Results:
- The majority of catheters (86.8%) were inserted into the femoral vein.
- Femoral catheters had a functioning duration of 17 days, jugular 17.3 days, and subclavian 25.9 days (p=0.03).
- Infection rates were low across all sites (femoral 5.5%, jugular 7.1%), with no statistically significant difference. Similarly, bacteremia rates were low (femoral 3.7%, jugular 4.8%) without significant differences. Complication-free rates were high (femoral 77%, jugular 71.4%, subclavian 68.4%), with differences approaching statistical significance (p=0.06).
Conclusions:
- The rate of infections and serious complications for femoral vein hemodialysis catheters is low.
- Femoral vein catheterization does not appear to carry an increased risk for hemodialysis access.
- Clinical experience supports the safety and efficacy of femoral vein catheter insertion.
Background/Aim:
Hemodialysis catheter, as an integral part of hemodialysis, is a catheter placed into the jugular, subclav ian and femoral vein. The most common catheter-related complications are infections and thrombosis. The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence of complications associated with differently inserted central-vein catheters for hemodialysis.
Methods:
The study was organized as a prospective examination during the period from December 2003 to No vember 2006, and included all patients who needed an active depuration by hemodialysis, hospitalized at the Clinical Center Kragujevac. The subject of the study were 464 central-vein catheters inserted during the mentioned period and there were recorded all complications related to the placement and usage of catheters.
Results:
The largest percent of inserted catheters was into the femoral vein--403 (86.8%), significantly less into the jugular vein--42 (9.2%), while into the subclavian vein there were placed only 19 catheters (4%). The average of femoral catheter functioning was 17 catheter days, in jugular catheters it was 17.3 days while the subclavian catheters had an average rate of functioning of 25.9 catheter days; there was found a statistically significant difference re garding the duration of functioning (p = 0.03). By microbe colonization of smear culture of the skin at the catheter in sertion site, in clinically present suspicion of catheter infection, there was obtained a positive finding in 5.5% of catheters placed into the femoral vein and 7.1% of catheters instilled into the jugular vein, of which Staphylococcus aureus was the most important bacterial type, without statistically significant difference (p = 0.51). Haemoculture, done when there was a suspicion of bacteriemia, was positive in 3.7% of the patients with femoral and 4.8% with jugular catheters; Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacteria type, but there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.65). Colonizing the smears of the cut catheter tops, there was found a positive finding in 8.9% of femoral and 4.7% of jugular catheters in which the mentioned type of staphylococcal bacteria was prevalent, without statistically significant difference (p = 0.82). In 77% of femoral, 71.4% of jugular and 68.4% of subclavian catheters, there were no complications associated with insertion and manipulation of catheters for hemodialysis and the difference was at the limits of statistical significance (p = 0.06).
Conclusion:
Unconvincing rate of infections and a smaller percent of serious complications associated with the placement and use of central vein catheters instilled into the femoral vein, indicate that personal experience is sufficient recommendation to convince us that femoral vein does not represent a region with an increased risk for insertion of hemodialysis catheters.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...

