The reference limits and cut-off value for serum soluble transferrin receptors for diagnosing iron deficiency in

N Vendt1, T Talvik, S Leedo

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. neve.vendt@kliinikum.ee

Insights

Serum soluble transferrin receptors (sTfR) effectively diagnose childhood iron deficiency (ID). This study established reference limits and optimal cut-off values for sTfR testing in infants, showing method-specific values are crucial for accurate ID diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Hematology
  • Nutritional Biochemistry
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Childhood iron deficiency (ID) is a significant global health concern.
  • Serum soluble transferrin receptors (sTfR) are recognized biomarkers for diagnosing ID.
  • Establishing reliable reference ranges and diagnostic cut-offs for sTfR is essential for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine reference limits for serum sTfR concentrations in healthy Estonian infants aged 9-12 months.
  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sTfR for identifying iron deficiency in this population.
  • To compare the performance of two different assay methods (IDeA and Tina-quant) for sTfR measurement.

Main Methods:

  • sTfR concentration was measured in 179 infants using IDeA and Tina-quant assays.
  • Iron deficiency was defined by serum ferritin levels <10 microg/l.
  • Reference limits (5th-95th percentile) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cut-off values.

Main Results:

  • Reference limits for sTfR were 1.5-2.7 mg/l (IDeA) and 4.1-7.8 mg/l (Tina-quant).
  • The two methods showed poor agreement.
  • Optimal cut-off values for ID diagnosis were >2.4 mg/l (IDeA; sensitivity 84%, specificity 94%) and >7.4 mg/l (Tina-quant; sensitivity 80%, specificity 92%).

Conclusions:

  • Serum sTfR is an efficient diagnostic tool for childhood iron deficiency in infants.
  • Method-specific cut-off values are necessary for accurate interpretation of sTfR results.
  • Further research may be needed to harmonize results between different sTfR assay methods.