Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall. The coating...
Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a column.
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems01:08

Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems

In gas chromatography, the sample is introduced as a vapor plug into the carrier gas stream for high efficiency and resolution. A microsyringe injects the sample solution into a heated sample port, vaporizing it and mixing it with the carrier gas. This process is important to ensure the sample is properly prepared for analysis. Thermally sensitive samples can be injected directly into the column and volatilized by slowly increasing the column temperature.
Two primary injection methods are used...
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations01:15

Optimizing Chromatographic Separations

Optimizing chromatographic separations is crucial for obtaining clean separations in a minimum amount of time. Optimization is required for several factors, including kinetic effects related to band broadening, plate height, capacity factor, and separation factor.
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chemical, morphological, and genetic characterization of the floral scent and scent-releasing structures of Gynandropsis gynandra (Cleomaceae, Brassicales).

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2025
Same author

National prospective cohort study of the burden of acute small bowel obstruction.

BJS open·2019
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder pathology.

The British journal of surgery·2016
Same author

Quantification of trace fatty acid methyl esters in diesel fuel by using multidimensional gas chromatography with electron and chemical ionization mass spectrometry.

Journal of separation science·2016
Same author

Rapid determination of sildenafil and its analogues in dietary supplements using gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2016
Same author

Unique ion filter: a data reduction tool for GC/MS data preprocessing prior to chemometric analysis.

Analytical chemistry·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

Modulation-induced error in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic separations.

J J Harynuk1, A H Kwong, P J Marriott

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G2G2, Canada. james.harynuk@ualberta.ca

Journal of Chromatography. A
|March 29, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) generates sub-peaks, unlike 1D GC. This study quantifies errors in GCxGC quantitation, finding phase-shifting errors are significant for trace analytes, but generalized rank annihilation method (GRAM) offers higher precision.

More Related Videos

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography
  • Chemometrics

Background:

  • Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) generates multiple sub-peaks per analyte, differing from 1D GC which produces single peaks.
  • Quantitation in GCxGC typically involves integrating sub-peaks or using higher-order methods like generalized rank annihilation method (GRAM).
  • Trace analytes in GCxGC are susceptible to errors, particularly from modulation and phase-induced shifts, which are magnified due to low signal-to-noise ratios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and quantify sources of error in GCxGC quantitation, specifically modulation and phase-induced errors.
  • To compare the accuracy and precision of traditional integration-based quantitation with the generalized rank annihilation method (GRAM).
  • To provide guidelines for optimizing modulation ratio (MR) for accurate quantitation in GCxGC and related techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simulated data to control and evaluate sources of error independently.
  • Applied traditional cumulative sub-peak integration and generalized rank annihilation method (GRAM) for quantitation.
  • Investigated the impact of modulation ratio (MR) on quantitation accuracy and precision.

Main Results:

  • Modulation process errors were found to be at most 1% for signals at 10x limit of detection (LOD).
  • Phase-shifting errors significantly impacted trace analytes, causing up to 6.4% error with conventional integration for symmetrical peaks.
  • GRAM analysis demonstrated superior precision, with errors of 1.8% and 0.6% at MR 1.5 and 3.0, respectively, for symmetrical peaks.

Conclusions:

  • GRAM analysis is more precise than traditional integration for GCxGC, especially for trace analytes.
  • A minimum MR of 3.0 is recommended for high-precision analyses and multivariate techniques to maintain data density.
  • Guidelines are proposed for selecting MR and number of sub-peaks to minimize phase-shift errors, applicable to GCxGC and LCxLC.