Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Prevalence in two-phase surveys: accuracy of screening procedure and corrected estimates
Johanne Morvan1, Joël Coste, Christian H Roux
1School of Public Health, Nancy University, Nancy, France.
Background:
Two-phase surveys often are used to estimate prevalence, in particular when the disease is rare or the case ascertainment procedure difficult and/or costly. However, few authors of such surveys take into account the sensitivity error associated with the use of a screening procedure in the first phase and its imprecision in correcting the prevalence estimate and confidence interval.
Methods:
Two examples of two-phase surveys of rheumatic diseases (hip and knee osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies) are used to present methodological approaches to obtain corrected prevalence estimates. Two methods for assessing the accuracy of the screening procedure are described--two-phase pilot and case-control designs--that are best suited for frequent and rare diseases, respectively, and naive and corrected estimates of prevalence compared.
Results:
When the sensitivity error is not taken into account, prevalence is underestimated, as is, especially, the width of its confidence interval. In our examples, the corrected confidence interval width increased up to 50% as compared with naïve one.
Conclusions:
The screening procedure accuracy should be thoroughly assessed in two-phase prevalence surveys and prevalence estimates and their confidence intervals corrected accordingly.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
01:08Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
01:24Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
01:13Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...