Mistakes in validating the accuracy of a prediction classifier in high-dimensional but small-sample microarray data
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
1Department of Applied Mathematics, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea. leesh@sejong.ac.kr
Abstract:
A major interest in gene expression microarray studies is to develop an accurate classifier which can be adopted in clinical practice. The usage of large numbers of genes with small data samples may lead to overfitting in classification, and generate promising, but often nonreproducible results. Therefore, assessing the reproducibility of a classifier is necessary. Appropriate methods for validating a developed classifier and estimating its predicting accuracy are discussed. In addition, some mistakes that can arise in the cross validation process are reviewed using published articles in prominent medical journals, to prevent the indefinite results of a classifier development from leading to inappropriate treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
The...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
