Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementation of NIH inclusion guidelines: survey of NIH study section members
1Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. htaylor@jhsph.edu
Scientific Review Group (SRG) members find National Institutes of Health (NIH) inclusion guidelines effective for ensuring diversity in clinical research. SRG members believe Principal Investigators generally comply with these diversity mandates.
Area of Science:
- Clinical research policy
- Health equity
- Research ethics
Background:
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandates inclusion of women, minorities, and children in clinical research.
- Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), NIH Scientific Review Groups (SRGs), and program staff oversee PI adherence to inclusion guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey SRG members regarding their experiences and attitudes toward NIH inclusion guidelines.
- To identify respondent characteristics predicting attitudes towards the inclusion policy.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to 746 SRG members.
- 425 SRG members responded to the survey.
- Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were performed on the collected data.
Main Results:
- SRG members reported NIH inclusion guidelines increase attention to diversity in clinical research.
- Respondents view gender and race as crucial for assessing study sample diversity.
- SRG members believe current NIH guidelines adequately promote the inclusion of underrepresented groups.
- SRG members perceive Principal Investigators as generally compliant with inclusion guidelines.
Conclusions:
- Respondents' potential bias due to NIH funding is a limitation.
- Future research should examine IRB and NIH program officer perceptions of PI compliance.
- Further studies are needed to assess the broader societal impact of these inclusion policies.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Clinical Trials: Overview
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.