Mesoporous silica nanoparticles inhibit cellular respiration

Zhimin Tao1, Matthew P Morrow, Tewodros Asefa

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.

Nano Letters
|April 2, 2008
PubMed

Insights

SBA-15 mesoporous silica nanoparticles inhibited cellular respiration and ATP production in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. MCM-41 showed minimal impact, suggesting differential nanoparticle toxicity.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Nanotoxicology
  • Cellular Respiration

Background:

  • Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) like MCM-41 and SBA-15 are widely investigated for biomedical applications.
  • Understanding their potential cellular impacts, particularly on mitochondrial function, is crucial for safe application.
  • Mitochondrial respiration is a key indicator of cellular health and energy production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of MCM-41 and SBA-15 nanoparticles on mitochondrial O2 consumption (respiration) in different cell types and isolated mitochondria.
  • To assess the impact of these nanoparticles on cellular ATP levels and metabolic fuel utilization.
  • To determine the specificity of nanoparticle effects on cellular respiration.

Main Methods:

  • Exposure of HL-60 (myeloid) and Jurkat (lymphoid) cells, along with isolated mitochondria, to varying concentrations of MCM-41 and SBA-15 nanoparticles.
  • Measurement of cellular O2 consumption rates using respirometry.
  • Analysis of cellular ATP levels and glutathione content.
  • Assessment of respiration onset in metabolically deprived cells upon glucose addition.

Main Results:

  • SBA-15 significantly inhibited cellular respiration in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, affecting both cell lines and isolated mitochondria.
  • Cellular ATP levels mirrored the observed inhibition of respiration by SBA-15.
  • MCM-41 demonstrated minimal to no significant impact on cellular respiration rates, although it delayed the onset of glucose-supported respiration.
  • Neither nanoparticle affected cellular glutathione levels, but both inhibited isolated mitochondrial respiration.

Conclusions:

  • SBA-15 exhibits significant mitochondrial toxicity, impacting cellular respiration and energy production.
  • MCM-41 appears to have a lower toxicity profile concerning direct respiration inhibition, but potential indirect effects on metabolic pathways warrant further investigation.
  • The differential effects highlight the importance of nanoparticle type and structure in determining cellular and mitochondrial responses.