Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Configural processing and face viewpoint.

Elinor McKone1

  • 1School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. McKone@anu.edu.au

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The composite effect reveals that human (but not other primate) faces are special to humans.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Relationships between retinal structure and function and vision-related quality of life measures in advanced age-related macular degeneration.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2021
Same author

Why the other-race effect matters: Poor recognition of other-race faces impacts everyday social interactions.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2021
Same author

Correlation of Central Versus Peripheral Macular Structure-Function With Acuity in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Translational vision science & technology·2021
Same author

A critical period for faces: Other-race face recognition is improved by childhood but not adult social contact.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Caricaturing can improve facial expression recognition in low-resolution images and age-related macular degeneration.

Journal of vision·2019
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Configural face processing remains robust across different facial views, even profiles. However, part-based processing is hindered by view changes, suggesting configural processing aids reliable face identification despite variations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Configural/holistic processing is crucial for face recognition, typically studied using frontal views.
  • Understanding how different facial viewpoints affect configural processing is essential for a comprehensive model of face recognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of viewing angle (front, three-quarter, profile) on configural face processing.
  • To determine whether part-based or configural processing is more affected by changes in facial viewpoint.

Main Methods:

  • Employed composite and peripheral inversion tasks across six experiments.
  • Tested frontal (0°), three-quarter (45°), and profile (90°) facial views.
  • Compared processing of normal-configuration faces with disrupted-configuration faces (inverted, misaligned, scrambled).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • An overall disadvantage was observed in identifying profile views, stemming solely from part-based processing.
  • View effects on part-based processing were consistent across normal and disrupted face configurations.
  • Configural processing remained equally strong across all views, regardless of viewing conditions (clear or degraded).

Conclusions:

  • Part-based processing is sensitive to facial viewpoint, likely due to reduced natural frequency and feature occlusion in profile views.
  • Configural processing remains unaffected by viewpoint, highlighting its role in robust face identification across varying local information.
  • Image-plane rotation (upright-inverted) impacts configural processing, unlike depth rotation, suggesting contributions of innate and experience-based factors.