Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncontrolled Hypertension Prevalence, Characteristic Profiles, and Risk of Cardiorenal and Metabolic Outcomes: Insights from the EnligHTN Study.

Advances in therapy·2026
Same author

Attentional focus and imagery vividness facilitate corticospinal excitability during contralateral action observation and motor imagery.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Altered corpus callosum microstructure in people with non-syndromic congenital mirror movements (CMM).

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Randomized-controlled trial of skills-based vr vs. distraction vr vs. sham VR for chronic low back pain.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Phase coupling in the beta and gamma frequencies of motor cortex activity is elevated in people with Parkinson's disease when medication is temporarily withheld.

Neuroreport·2026
Same author

Positive appraisal style predicts long-term stress resilience and mediates the effect of a pro-resilience intervention.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.

Elizabeth A Franz1, Alexandra Sebastian, Christina Hust

  • 1Department of Psychology, Otago University, Dunedin, New Zealand. lfranz@psy.otago.ac.nz

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Spatial translation processes can start before the central bottleneck when using a viewer-centered perspective, but not an allocentric one. This research uses the psychological refractory period (PRP) approach to explore cognitive processing limitations.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • The central bottleneck theory posits a limit on information processing capacity.
  • Understanding when cognitive processes can initiate before this bottleneck is crucial for cognitive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if spatial translation processes can commence prior to the central bottleneck.
  • To examine the influence of egocentric (viewer-centered) versus allocentric (non-viewer-centered) perspectives on this process.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the psychological refractory period (PRP) methodology with dual-task paradigms.
  • Manipulated stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) and task demands (tone discrimination and spatial translation).
  • Compared results from viewer-centered and non-viewer-centered spatial processing.

Main Results:

  • Spatial translation trials were slower than non-translation trials in single tasks.
  • When using a viewer-centered perspective, the impact of spatial translation on response time decreased at shorter SOAs, suggesting parallel processing.
  • With an allocentric perspective, spatial translation effects were additive with SOA, indicating sequential processing.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial translation processes can initiate before the central bottleneck when adopting a viewer-centered perspective.
  • An allocentric perspective necessitates spatial translation processes to occur after the central bottleneck.
  • Viewer perspective critically influences the engagement of central bottleneck limitations in cognitive tasks.