Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
The failure of torcetrapib: is there a case for independent preclinical and clinical testing?
Background:
Torcetrapib was spectacularly withdrawn in December 2006, when a Phase III clinical trial showed increased cardiovascular adverse events.
Objective:
To consider possible reasons why the development of torcetrapib proceeded so far before adverse events became apparent.
Method:
Published preclinical and clinical data for torcetrapib are reviewed.
Results/Conclusions:
It seems likely that independent preclinical testing would have shown that torcetrapib increased blood pressure. Such a finding might have halted the development of torcetrapib prior to clinical trial. Although the early clinical testing of torcetrapib showed favourable effects on the surrogate endpoints, an ability to increase blood pressure started to become apparent. When clinical outcome studies were undertaken with torcetrapib, it was shown not to have any benefit on atherosclerosis and to increase cardiovascular events. These finding might have come to light earlier if clinical outcomes studies had had a higher priority than repeated trials, in different populations, of torcetrapib on surrogate outcomes.
Insights
Torcetrapib
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular research
- Pharmacology
- Drug development
Background:
- Torcetrapib, a CETP inhibitor, was withdrawn in 2006 due to increased cardiovascular adverse events in Phase III trials.
- The drug's development proceeded extensively before safety concerns were evident.
Discussion:
- Preclinical data may have indicated torcetrapib's potential to increase blood pressure, a finding that could have halted development earlier.
- Early clinical trials focused on surrogate endpoints, potentially delaying the recognition of adverse effects like hypertension.
Key Insights:
- Independent preclinical testing could have identified torcetrapib's hypertensive effects, preventing further clinical development.
- Prioritizing clinical outcome studies over surrogate endpoint trials might have revealed safety issues sooner.
Outlook:
- Future drug development should emphasize robust preclinical safety assessments and prioritize clinical outcome studies.
- Lessons from torcetrapib underscore the importance of comprehensive safety evaluations in cardiovascular drug research.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment