Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Inflammatory and non-invasive vascular markers: the multimarker approach for risk stratification in coronary artery
Ignatios Ikonomidis1, Kimon Stamatelopoulos, John Lekakis
12nd Cardiology Department, University of Athens, Attikon Hospital, Perikleous 19, N. Chalkidona, Athens 14343, Greece. ignoik@otenet.gr
Insights
Inflammatory proteins like C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) contribute to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. A multimarker approach combining inflammatory and vascular markers may improve cardiovascular risk prediction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Inflammation and Immunology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Atherosclerosis involves inflammatory proteins that promote plaque formation and rupture.
- Key inflammatory markers include C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6).
- These markers are implicated in monocyte-macrophage activation, foam cell formation, and altered cytokine profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of inflammatory proteins and non-invasive vascular markers in cardiovascular risk assessment.
- To evaluate the predictive value of individual and combined markers in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and the general population.
- To explore the potential of a multimarker approach for improved cardiovascular risk stratification.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of blood concentrations of CRP, MCSF, and IL-6.
- Assessment of non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, including carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity.
- Evaluation of the prognostic value of these markers, individually and in combination, for cardiovascular events and adverse outcomes.
Main Results:
- Elevated CRP, MCSF, and IL-6 levels are associated with increased cardiovascular event rates and adverse outcomes in CAD patients, independent of traditional risk factors.
- MCSF shows additive predictive value beyond CRP in CAD patients.
- Combination of non-invasive vascular tests improves prognostic accuracy compared to individual tests.
Conclusions:
- Inflammatory markers and non-invasive vascular assessments provide valuable prognostic information for cardiovascular risk.
- A multimarker approach, combining established inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP) or vascular markers (e.g., IMT) with novel biochemical and vascular markers, may offer additive prognostic information.
- Further research is needed to determine the impact of therapeutic strategies on cardiovascular risk reduction based on these marker changes.
Abstract:
Current thinking supports the notion that several inflammatory proteins intervene with endothelium and haemostatic factors leading to plaque formation and rupture. Of these, C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) promote atherogenesis by inducing monocyte-macrophage activation, foam cell formation, platelet activation, tissue factor expression, release of other procoagulant cytokines or downregulation of atheroprotective cytokines such as interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor b-1 (TGFb-1). CRP, MSCF and IL-6 are interrelated and have been found in increased blood concentrations in CAD. Increased levels of CRP and IL-6 predict a higher cardiovascular event rate in the general population and in addition to high MCSF or low TGFb-1 predict adverse outcome in CAD patients independently of traditional risk factors. Moreover, in CAD patients, the predictive value of MCSF is additive and beyond that of CRP suggesting the need of a "multimarker approach" in assessing cardiovascular risk. Accumulating evidence supports the utility of non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, namely carotid intimal media thickness, flow mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, augmentation index or pulse wave velocity, in the prediction of cardiovascular risk particularly in primary prevention settings. The combination of these non-invasive tests has been shown to improve their prognostic accuracy compared to each other alone. Although several therapeutic strategies like vaccination against antigens promoting atherogenesis, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, statins, and ACE inhibitors may reduce the levels of these inflammatory markers and improve the non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, the impact on cardiovascular risk resulting from these changes is unknown. The combination of an established inflammatory marker such as CRP or a vascular marker such as IMT with novel biochemical and vascular markers of cardiovascular disease may offer additive prognostic information for adverse outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
