Coronary surgery for acute coronary syndrome: which determinants of outcome remain?
K Alexiou1, U Kappert, A Staroske
1Dept of Cardiac Surgery, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany. k_alexiou@yahoo.de
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) shows good results, but outcomes vary by ACS type. Individual risk assessment is crucial for patients undergoing CABG with ACS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- Mortality risk of CABG post-myocardial infarction is debated.
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) complicates CABG outcomes.
- This study analyzes in-hospital mortality in ACS patients undergoing CABG.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess outcomes of CABG in patients with ACS.
- To identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in this cohort.
- To stratify risk based on ACS type and clinical factors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3,127 patients undergoing primary isolated CABG (2003-2005).
- Focused on 220 patients with ACS, categorized into unstable angina, non-ST-elevation infarction, and ST-elevation infarction.
- Recorded clinical data, morbidity, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.4%, varying by ACS group (2.2% to 9.2%).
- Key predictors of mortality included age, NYHA class, low ejection fraction, shock, renal disease, and high EuroSCORE.
- Time to revascularization was critical in STEMI patients (6h cutoff).
Conclusions:
- CABG can yield good results in ACS patients.
- Clinical outcomes are significantly influenced by ACS subtype.
- Individualized risk stratification and timely intervention (especially in STEMI) are essential.
Background:
The mortality risk associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction remains controversial. The objective of the present study was therefore to analyze the outcome and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients (pts) referred to CABG with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Patients And Methods:
Between January 2003 and May 2005, a total of 3,127 pts underwent primary isolated CABG at our institution, including 220 pts with ACS. Out of these, unstable angina pectoris was present in 88 pts (group I), 97 pts (group II) had non-ST-elevation infarction, whereas 35 pts (group III) had ST-elevation infarction. Clinical data, in-hospital morbidity and mortality were recorded and studied retrospectively.
Results:
Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.4% (n = 14) in the complete cohort, being 2.2% in group I (n = 2), 9.2% in group II (n = 9) and 8.5% (n = 3) in group III (P < 0.05). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses identified age, NYHA, ejection fraction < 45%, catecholamine support, cardiogenic shock, renal disease and the additive EuroSCORE > 10 (P < 0.0001) as significant predictors related to in-hospital mortality. The mean time from the onset of symptoms to revascularization differed significantly between survivors (5.1 +/- 2.7 h) and no survivors (11.4 +/- 3.2 h) (P < 0.0007) in the STEMI group. Preoperative cTnI did not provide any prognostic information.
Conclusion:
CABG in pts with ACS can be performed with good clinical results. The clinical outcome is particular depending on the different groups of ACS. Therefore an individual risk stratification of each pts in ACS is necessary. The time interval of 6 h seems to be crucial as prognostic variable in the STEMI-group.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
