Prospective comparative study of single dose versus 3-day administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in minimum

Mizuaki Sakura1, Satoru Kawakami, Souichiro Yoshida

  • 1Department of Urology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

Reducing antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) using minimum incision endoscopic surgery (MIES) is safe. A single dose of AMP effectively prevents surgical site infections (SSI) and remote infections (RI).

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Infectious Disease

Background:

  • Overuse of antimicrobial agents necessitates reducing antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP).
  • Surgical site infection (SSI) is a concern following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
  • Minimum incision endoscopic surgery (MIES) is an evolving surgical approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate the reduction of AMP in MIES-RRP.
  • To assess the impact of reduced AMP on SSI and remote infection (RI) rates.
  • To determine the feasibility of a single-dose AMP regimen.

Main Methods:

  • 101 patients undergoing MIES-RRP were divided into a 3-day AMP group (n=52) and a single-dose AMP group (n=49).
  • Tazobactam sodium/piperacillin sodium (TAZ/PIPC) was administered intravenously.
  • SSI and RI occurrences were analyzed; additional antibiotics were given only if infection developed.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in SSI rates between the 3-day (3.8%) and single-dose (6.1%) groups (P = 0.6).
  • Remote infection rates did not increase in the single-dose AMP group.
  • Tazobactam sodium/piperacillin sodium (TAZ/PIPC) was the antimicrobial agent used.

Conclusions:

  • Antimicrobial prophylaxis dose can be safely reduced in MIES-RRP without increasing SSI or RI.
  • A single dose of AMP is a feasible and effective standard regimen for MIES-RRP.
  • Active surveillance for postoperative infections is crucial for prompt treatment.