Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Pilot randomized phase II study of celecoxib in oral premalignant lesions
Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou1, William N William, Andrew J Dannenberg
1Department of Thoracic/Head, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. vpapadim@mdanderson.org
Purpose:
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibition suppresses carcinogenesis in preclinical models and is a promising strategy for preventing oral cancer. In this pilot randomized phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in patients with oral premalignant lesions (OPL).
Experimental Design:
Patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=18), celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n=17), or celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n=15) for 12 weeks. Six additional patients received celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) in an unblinded extension of the study. Biopsies were obtained at baseline and week 12. All patients entering the study were required to have at least one histologically confirmed early (atypical hyperplasia, atypical hyperkeratosis, or mild dysplasia) or advanced (moderate to severe dysplasia) OPL.
Results:
Forty-nine patients (46 of 50 randomized and 3 of 6 open label) were evaluable for efficacy analyses. There were no statistically significant differences between the response rates of the randomly assigned arms: placebo, 33.3% (6 of 18); celecoxib 100 mg twice daily, 41.2% (7 of 17); and celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, 20.0% (3 of 15). Two patients responded on celecoxib 400 mg twice daily. Celecoxib was generally well tolerated. Patients with higher baseline COX-2 mRNA levels had an increased risk of disease progression within 3 months.
Conclusions:
Celecoxib at 100 or 200 mg twice daily was ineffective in controlling OPLs in this randomized controlled trial. This result and cardiovascular toxicity results of other (large scale) randomized controlled trials of selective COX-2 inhibitors have discouraged the continued investigation of these agents in oral cancer chemoprevention. Better methods for identifying high-risk patients and more active interventions are needed for future oral cancer chemoprevention trials.
Insights
Celecoxib did not effectively treat oral premalignant lesions (OPL) in a pilot study. Further research is needed to identify high-risk patients and develop better oral cancer chemoprevention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Chemoprevention
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) specific inhibition shows promise for oral cancer prevention in preclinical models.
- Oral premalignant lesions (OPLs) are precursors to oral cancer, necessitating effective chemoprevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in patients with OPLs.
- To assess celecoxib's potential as an oral cancer chemoprevention agent.
Main Methods:
- A pilot randomized phase II study involving patients with histologically confirmed OPLs.
- Patients were randomized to placebo, celecoxib 100 mg twice daily, or celecoxib 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks.
- Biopsies were collected at baseline and week 12 for analysis.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in response rates were observed between placebo and celecoxib arms (100 or 200 mg twice daily).
- Celecoxib was generally well tolerated, with no major safety concerns reported.
- Higher baseline COX-2 mRNA levels correlated with an increased risk of disease progression within 3 months.
Conclusions:
- Celecoxib at tested doses was ineffective in controlling OPLs.
- Cardiovascular toxicity concerns and lack of efficacy discourage further investigation of selective COX-2 inhibitors for oral cancer chemoprevention.
- Future trials require improved methods for identifying high-risk individuals and more potent interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
