Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic resolution selection in ultrasonic strain imaging.

Joel E Lindop1, Graham M Treece, Andrew H Gee

  • 1Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK. jel35@eng.cam.ac.uk

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|April 4, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential for Reinforcement Learning in the Cerebellum.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

The clinical utility of imaging in osteoarthritis and its importance in future prediction of total hip replacement; a nested case-control study within the AGES-Reykjavik cohort.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2025
Same author

3-D joint space mapping at the ankle from weight-bearing CT: reproducibility, repeatability, and challenges for standardisation.

European radiology·2023
Same author

Impact of Scala Tympani Geometry on Insertion Forces during Implantation.

Biosensors·2022
Same author

Pixel-based approach to delay multiply and sum beamforming in combination with Wiener filter for improving ultrasound image quality.

Ultrasonics·2022
Same author

Multiparametric 3-D analysis of bone and joint space width at the knee from weight bearing computed tomography.

Osteoarthritis imaging·2022
Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

A Nomogram Based on Ultrasound Features for Predicting Major Intra-Operative Hemorrhage in Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

MedLP-HAFB-CLIP: Hierarchical Adaptive Large Model With Learnable Medical Prompts for Level II Ultrasound Standard Plane Identification.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Data Assimilating B-splines for Model-based Regularization in Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces an automated system for ultrasonic strain imaging parameter selection, improving diagnostic image quality and reliability. It simplifies the sonographer's role by adapting to varying ultrasound data conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Ultrasound technology

Background:

  • Ultrasonic strain imaging is a promising diagnostic tool.
  • Reliability and ease-of-use are crucial for clinical adoption.
  • Parameter selection significantly impacts image quality and diagnostic value.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the trade-off between resolution and estimation precision in ultrasonic strain imaging.
  • To develop models relating imaging parameters to data properties and estimation precision.
  • To create an automated system for optimizing imaging parameters based on data quality and desired precision.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the relationship between resolution and estimation precision.
  • Developed predictive models for imaging parameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implemented an automated system for parameter optimization.
  • Validated the system using simulation, in vitro, and in vivo data.

    • Main Results:

    • Established models for resolution-estimation precision trade-offs.
    • Demonstrated an automated system that adapts imaging parameters to data quality.
    • Achieved reliable image quality across varying signal decorrelation levels.
    • Reduced complexity for sonographers in strain imaging.

    Conclusions:

    • Automated parameter optimization enhances ultrasonic strain imaging reliability and ease-of-use.
    • The developed system produces meaningful images under diverse scan conditions.
    • This approach supports wider clinical application of strain imaging diagnostics.