Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-World Response and Super-Response to Eptinezumab over 48 Weeks in Migraine: The Prospective Multicenter EMBRACE III Study.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Positive Response to Rehabilitation Initiated 18 Months after Penetrating Cranial Injury with Screwdriver Involving Temporal Lobe and Brainstem.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Responders and super-responders to atogepant after 24 weeks of treatment in migraine: real-world evidence from the GIANT-2 study.

The journal of headache and pain·2026
Same author

Ken Heilman: A Life Well Lived.

Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology·2025
Same author

Case Reports and Case Studies: An Endangered Species.

Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology·2025
Same author

Midline Hand Drift as a Possible Sign of Neurologic Disorder.

Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Spatial attentional bias in normal people: object or viewer-centered.

Valeria Drago1, Gregory P Crucian, David B FitzGerald

  • 1Department of Neurology and Center for Neuropsychological Studies, University of Florida College of Medicine and Neurology Service, Gainesville, FL 32610-0236, USA. valeria.drago@neurology.ufl.edu

Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior
|April 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Normal subjects exhibit a distal bias when bisecting radial lines. This study supports a body-centered hypothesis, indicating bias increases with proximity to the midsagittal plane.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Individuals often exhibit a systematic distal bias when bisecting radial lines.
  • Existing hypotheses include object-centered, retinotopic, and body-centered attentional biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of distal bias in radial line bisection.
  • To test object-centered, retinotopic, and body-centered hypotheses.

Main Methods:

  • Normal subjects bisected radial lines presented in a clockwise distribution below eye level.
  • Line orientation varied relative to the body's midsagittal plane.

Main Results:

  • Perception of the midpoint shifted systematically with line orientation.
  • A progressively greater distal bias was observed as lines approached the midsagittal plane.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the body-centered hypothesis for distal bias in radial line bisection.
  • Distal bias is influenced by the body-centered orientation of visual stimuli.