Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

04:42
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Sacral neuromodulation reprogramming: is it an office burden?
Frank N Burks1, Ananais C Diokno, Michelle J Lajiness
1Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3535 W. 13 Mile Road Suite 438, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. frank.burks@hotmail.com
Summary
Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) reprogramming is not burdensome, with patients averaging two visits yearly. Interstitial cystitis patients experienced no increased reprogramming burden.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Neurology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a treatment for lower urinary tract dysfunction.
- Understanding the frequency and reasons for SNM reprogramming is crucial for patient management.
- The impact of specific diagnoses, like interstitial cystitis, on reprogramming burden requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the burden of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) reprogramming.
- To identify the primary reasons for SNM reprogramming.
- To correlate reprogramming frequency with patient demographics and diagnoses.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 50 consecutive SNM implant patients (2002-2005).
- Analysis of 239 programming visits for 47 subjects with adequate follow-up.
- Correlation of reprogramming events with age, sex, indication, and diagnosis.
Main Results:
- Patients averaged two SNM reprogramming visits per year.
- No correlation found between reprogramming events and patient age, sex, or diagnosis.
- Interstitial cystitis patients did not experience a higher reprogramming burden.
Conclusions:
- SNM reprogramming burden is generally low, with most visits for routine follow-up.
- Reprogramming frequency is consistent across different patient demographics and diagnoses.
- SNM is a manageable treatment option, even for patients with interstitial cystitis.
