Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
Multi-step Preparation Technique to Recover Multiple Metabolite Compound Classes for In-depth and Informative Metabolomic Analysis
Published on: July 11, 2014
A method for quantifying the unstable and highly polar drug nafamostat mesilate in human plasma with optimized
Yan-guang Cao1, Ming Zhang, Dan Yu
1Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Abstract:
An advanced quantification method was developed with solid-phase extraction (SPE) and mass spectrometry (MS) determination for nafamostat, an unstable and highly polar drug, in human plasma. For unstable drugs with an ester group, the main analytical challenge is how to avoid the ester hydrolysis, and strong acid or alkaline conditions should be excluded during sample preparation. Considering that, we developed a relatively mild method with SPE for sample preparation without strong acid and alkaline treatment, which was optimized with different pHs and salt concentrations in phosphate-buffered saline treatment. The results indicated that pH 5 gave the most efficient extraction and 0.1 M salt concentration enhanced the extraction the most, with a minor effect on MS monitoring. The extraction method effectively avoided drug hydrolysis and achieved good drug enrichment over 82.2%. The linear range of quantification was 1.25-160 ng mL(-1). The stability of the drug in sample treatment was fully validated according to the sample processing procedure, including the stability in fresh blood, mobile phase, plasma and acidic methanol, and the results indicated that the drug remained stable during the whole sample preparation. Compared with a previous isotope-labeling method, more accurate and specific quantification of plasma concentration was achieved with liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization MS determination. With use of our method, nafamostat mesilate pharmacokinetics in 30 Chinese healthy volunteers was investigated with three doses via intravenous-drip infusion. The pharmacokinetic parameters were also estimated and compared with those of Japanese volunteers (slightly lower plasma concentration and longer terminal elimination half-life for Chinese volunteers). The difference in the pharmacokinetics may be ascribed to the quantification method, because previous isotope labeling may have overestimated the parent drug.
