Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling.

Ian A Sigal1, Michael R Hardisty, Cari M Whyne

  • 1Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. isigal@deverseye.org

Journal of Biomechanics
|April 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reducing Cartilage Warp in Nasal Reconstruction: The Role of Collagen and Proteoglycans.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Ergonomic risks in healthcare workers in acute care; the POSTURE framework.

Injury·2026
Same author

Smart scheduling of arthroplasty surgery with machine learning and optimisation improves operating room utilisation.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026
Same author

Vibrotactile feedback using exposure variation analysis to reduce musculoskeletal risk in surgical simulation.

Ergonomics·2026
Same author

Collagen microarchitecture from polarized light imaging: a biomechanics perspective.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same author

Systemic Treatments Impact Bone Quality in a Preclinical Model of Mixed Femoral Metastases.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Examination of participant sex bias in international society of biomechanics conference abstract submissions: patterns across cohorts, countries, and contexts.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Shear wave velocity of biceps femoris and medial gastrocnemius in different positions and intensities: a cross-sectional study in healthy young males.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Gait event detection using hybrid EMG/IMU systems: effect of SENIAM-constrained sensor placement on lower limb segments.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Relationship between knee adduction moment and knee contact forces during walking and running with modified foot progression angles.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Scaling contact force parameters across body size, limb count, and number of contact spheres.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The extrapolated body center of mass predicts subsequent foot placement choice during dynamic single-leg landings.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Mesh morphing techniques create accurate, specimen-specific finite element models of rat vertebrae efficiently. Automated wrapping and manual landmarks methods reduce effort for biomechanical analysis, preserving model quality and simulation accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanical Engineering
  • Computational Anatomy
  • Finite Element Analysis

Background:

  • Generating specimen-specific finite element models (FEM) for biomechanical analysis is labor-intensive.
  • Advances in meshing software still require significant effort for model preparation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate mesh morphing techniques for creating accurate, specimen-specific finite element models of caudal rat vertebrae.
  • To compare automated wrapping (AW) and manual landmarks (ML) morphing algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and applied AW and ML morphing algorithms to adapt a source mesh to a target specimen geometry.
  • Generated natural specimen-specific FEMs using microCT data.
  • Evaluated morphing accuracy by measuring geometric distances and comparing FE simulation results under axial loading.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both AW and ML successfully reproduced target geometries with high accuracy (median distances of 18.8 and 32.2 micrometers, respectively).
  • Morphing preserved mesh quality, yielding models suitable for FE simulation.
  • FE analysis showed minor differences in deformation, strain, and stress predictions between natural and morphed models.

Conclusions:

  • Mesh morphing techniques offer an efficient alternative to conventional methods for generating specimen-specific FEMs.
  • These techniques facilitate inter-model comparisons and parametric studies for optimizing geometry.
  • AW and ML provide viable methods for creating accurate biomechanical models with reduced effort.