Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of phylogenetic network methods using computer simulation.

Steven M Woolley1, David Posada, Keith A Crandall

  • 1Computational Biology Program, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America. stevenwoolley@wustl.edu

Plos One
|April 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Antimicrobial resistance and gut microbiome profiles in wild and cultured shrimp (Penaeus monodon) from the coast of the northern Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same author

<i>ATG16L1</i> and <i>OPTN</i> as a novel prognostic gene expression signature in acute myeloid leukemia survival.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

resLens: genomic language models to enhance antibiotic resistance gene detection.

npj antimicrobials and resistance·2026
Same author

A comparison of methods for the optimal recovery of the human fecal virome.

ISME communications·2026
Same author

Unraveling the Phylogenetic Signal of Gene Expression from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Phylogenetic network methods are crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships. This study shows that while some methods perform well without recombination, none accurately capture evolutionary history when recombination is present.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Computational biology
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Assessing the performance of various phylogenetic network and tree-building methods is essential for accurate evolutionary inference.
  • Recombination significantly complicates the reconstruction of evolutionary histories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of multiple phylogenetic network and tree methods under varying conditions, including the presence and absence of recombination.
  • To identify the most robust methods for phylogenetic inference.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate phylogenetic network approaches (e.g., statistical parsimony, neighbor-net, median-joining) against standard tree methods (e.g., neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony).
  • Analyses were performed under low and high substitution rates, with and without simulated recombination.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • In the absence of recombination, most methods accurately recovered topology and branch lengths, with minimum spanning networks performing poorly.
  • At higher substitution rates, maximum parsimony and union of maximum parsimony trees showed the highest accuracy.
  • Recombination halved the accuracy of topology inference for all tested methods and prevented accurate branch length estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The study underscores the need for improved phylogenetic network methods that can effectively handle recombination.
  • Accurate detection and incorporation of recombination are critical for reliable phylogenetic studies.
  • Findings offer guidance for selecting appropriate network algorithms and provide a benchmark for future method development.