Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum likelihood supertrees.

Mike Steel1, Allen Rodrigo

  • 1Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. m.steel@math.canterbury.ac.nz

Systematic Biology
|April 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counting Rankings of Tree-Child Networks.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

Predicting the depth of the most recent common ancestor of a random sample of k species: the impact of phylogenetic tree shape.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

A Dichotomy Law for Certain Classes of Phylogenetic Networks.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Models of microbiome evolution incorporating host resource provisioning.

ISME communications·2025
Same author

The Asymptotic Distribution of the <i>k</i>-Robinson-Foulds Dissimilarity Measure on Labeled Trees.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2025
Same author

Surprising effects of differential loss in genome evolution: the last-one-out.

FEMS microbiology letters·2025
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

We introduce a maximum likelihood (ML) method for building phylogenetic supertrees. This statistically consistent approach accurately reconstructs species phylogenies, outperforming older methods like MRP.

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic supertrees are essential for synthesizing evolutionary relationships from multiple sources.
  • Existing methods like the Mirrored-Reflective-Pairwise (MRP) approach may lack statistical consistency.
  • Reconstructing species phylogenies from gene trees is challenging due to factors like incomplete lineage sorting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and analyze a maximum likelihood (ML) approach for phylogenetic supertree reconstruction.
  • To evaluate the statistical consistency of the proposed ML method compared to existing techniques.
  • To extend the ML approach for constructing species supertrees from gene trees, addressing challenges like incomplete lineage sorting.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed a maximum likelihood framework for combining phylogenetic trees into a supertree.
  • Utilized a simple exponential model of phylogenetic error.
  • Analyzed the statistical consistency of the ML supertree method and compared it with the MRP method.
  • Applied the ML approach to species supertree construction from gene trees.

    • Main Results:

    • The ML supertree method demonstrates statistical consistency, converging on the true species supertree with increasing input trees.
    • The widely used MRP method was shown to be statistically inconsistent under the exponential error model.
    • The ML approach maintains statistical consistency when constructing species supertrees from gene trees, even with incomplete lineage sorting.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed ML supertree reconstruction method offers a statistically consistent and reliable alternative to existing approaches.
    • This method provides a robust framework for inferring species phylogenies, particularly in the presence of gene tree discordance.
    • The findings have significant implications for evolutionary biology and the accurate reconstruction of species histories.