Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Cytosolic Calcium Measurements in Renal Epithelial Cells by Flow Cytometry
Published on: October 28, 2014
Pitfalls of measuring total blood calcium in patients with CKD
Cédric Gauci1, Olivier Moranne, Bruno Fouqueray
1Département de Physiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20-40 rue Leblanc, F-75015 Paris, France.
Insights
For chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, neither total calcium nor albumin-corrected total calcium accurately predicts ionized calcium levels. Both methods poorly identify hypo- or hypercalcemia, crucial for managing mineral and bone disorders.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Chemistry
Background:
- Mineral and bone disorders are common in chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- Current guidelines recommend regular calcium monitoring in CKD stages 3-5.
- Ionized calcium (iCa) is preferred, but total calcium (tCa) may be used if corrected for albumin.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of noncorrected and albumin-corrected total calcium (tCa) in predicting ionized calcium (iCa) in CKD patients.
- To assess the reliability of tCa measurements for identifying hypo- or hypercalcemia in this population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 691 consecutive patients with stages 3-5 CKD.
- Comparison of agreement between noncorrected tCa, albumin-corrected tCa, and measured iCa.
- Statistical assessment of factors influencing prediction accuracy.
Main Results:
- Agreement between tCa (corrected or noncorrected) and iCa was only fair.
- Low total CO(2) increased the risk of underestimating iCa with both tCa methods.
- Low albumin increased the risk of underestimating iCa with noncorrected tCa and overestimating iCa with albumin-corrected tCa.
Conclusions:
- Albumin-corrected tCa does not offer superior prediction of iCa compared to noncorrected tCa in CKD patients.
- Both tCa measurement methods demonstrate poor predictive value for hypo- or hypercalcemia in CKD.
Abstract:
Disorders of mineral and bone metabolism are prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The recent National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend that blood calcium (Ca) be regularly measured in patients with stages 3 to 5 CKD. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) position states that the measurement of ionized Ca (iCa) is preferred and that if total Ca (tCa) concentration is used instead, then it should be adjusted in the setting of hypoalbuminemia. In 691 consecutive patients with stages 3 to 5 CKD, we compared the ability of noncorrected and albumin-corrected tCa concentration to identify low, normal, or high iCa concentration. The agreement between noncorrected or albumin-corrected tCa and iCa was only fair. The risk for underestimating ionized calcium was independently increased by a low total CO(2) concentration when either noncorrected or albumin-corrected Ca was used and by a low albumin concentration only when noncorrected tCa was used. The risk for overestimating iCa was increased by a low albumin concentration only when albumin-corrected Ca was used. In conclusion, albumin-corrected tCa does not predict iCa better than noncorrected tCa. Moreover, both noncorrected and albumin-corrected tCa concentrations poorly predict hypo- or hypercalcemia in patients with CKD.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Skeleton and Calcium Homeostasis
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management

