Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Ultrasound-Guided Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Implantation in Myocardial Infarcted Mice
Published on: March 30, 2022
Stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for myocardial recovery after acute myocardial
Dietlind Zohlnhöfer1, Alban Dibra, Tobias Koppara
1Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. zohlnhoefer@dhm.mhn.de
Insights
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) did not improve myocardial regeneration or left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Available evidence does not support G-CSF
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Stem Cell Biology
Background:
- Experimental and early clinical trials suggest G-CSF may aid cardiac regeneration post-AMI.
- Clinical trial results for G-CSF in AMI patients are inconsistent, leaving its role unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of G-CSF-induced stem cell mobilization on myocardial regeneration.
- To synthesize data from randomized controlled trials of G-CSF in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified via PubMed, Cochrane Register, and cardiology conference proceedings (2003-2007).
- Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics and outcomes.
- Included RCTs focused on G-CSF for stem cell mobilization after reperfused AMI, reporting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes.
Main Results:
- Ten trials with 445 patients met inclusion criteria.
- Both G-CSF and placebo groups showed significant LVEF improvement.
- G-CSF did not enhance LVEF improvement compared to placebo (mean difference 1.32%, p=0.36).
- G-CSF did not significantly reduce infarct size compared to placebo (mean difference -0.15, p=0.17).
Conclusions:
- Current evidence does not support a beneficial effect of G-CSF in patients with AMI post-reperfusion.
- Further research may be needed to clarify any potential role of G-CSF in specific AMI patient subgroups.
Objectives:
The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on myocardial regeneration on the basis of a synthesis of the data generated by randomized, controlled clinical trials of G-CSF after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Background:
Experimental studies and early-phase clinical trials suggest that stem cell mobilization by G-CSF may have a positive impact on cardiac regeneration after AMI. The role of G-CSF in patients with AMI remains unclear considering the inconsistent results of several clinical trials.
Methods:
For our analysis, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings from major cardiology meetings, and Internet-based sources of information on clinical trials in cardiology from January 2003 to August 2007 served as sources. Two reviewers independently identified studies and abstracted data on sample size, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of interest. Eligible studies were randomized trials with stem cell mobilization by G-CSF after reperfused AMI that reported data regarding the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at follow-up.
Results:
Ten trials using stem cell mobilization by G-CSF, including 445 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvement in LVEF at follow-up was observed in both the G-CSF and placebo groups. Compared with placebo, stem cell mobilization by G-CSF did not enhance the improvement of LVEF at follow-up (mean difference 1.32% [95% confidence interval -1.52 to 4.16; p = 0.36]). Moreover, the mean difference of reduction of infarct size between the treatment and placebo groups was -0.15 (95% confidence interval -0.38 to 0.07, p = 0.17).
Conclusions:
Cumulatively, available evidence does not support a beneficial effect of G-CSF in patients with AMI after reperfusion.
More Related Videos
09:16Suppression of Pro-fibrotic Signaling Potentiates Factor-mediated Reprogramming of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts into Induced Cardiomyocytes
Published on: June 3, 2018
07:50Delayed Intramyocardial Delivery of Stem Cells after Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in a Murine Model
Published on: September 3, 2020