Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Spatial clustering of the failure to geocode and its implications for the detection of disease clustering
Dale L Zimmerman1, Xiangming Fang, Soumya Mazumdar
1Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Iowa, 241 Schaeffer Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. dale-zimmerman@uiowa.edu
Abstract:
Geocoding a study population as completely as possible is an important data assimilation component of many spatial epidemiologic studies. Unfortunately, complete geocoding is rare in practice. The failure of a substantial proportion of study subjects' addresses to geocode has consequences for spatial analyses, some of which are not yet fully understood. This article explicitly demonstrates that the failure to geocode can be spatially clustered, and it investigates the implications of this for the detection of disease clustering. A data set of more than 9000 ground-truthed addresses from Carroll County, Iowa, which was geocoded via a standard address matching and street interpolation algorithm, is used for this purpose. Through simulation of disease processes at these addresses, the authors show that spatial clustering of geocoding failure has no effect on the marginal power to detect spatial disease clustering if the likelihood of disease is independent of the failure to geocode, but that power is substantially reduced if disease likelihood and geocoding failure are positively associated.
Related Concept Videos
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
